Search Results for "Securitisation Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Securitisation Act"

252 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition Against Trial Court's Failure to Consider Interim Injunction in SARFAESI Act Matter — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Dr. Jaishith Jebakumar Manuel and Pon Manju Usha, filed a suit (O.S.No.118 of 2025) before the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Guarantors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Enforcement Case, Upholding Sale of Mortgaged Properties. The Court held that multiple litigations by guarantors constitute abuse of process and cannot defeat the expeditious recovery mechanism under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

23 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India dealt with civil appeals arising from special leave petitions challenging a common judgment of the Madras High Court. The d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Police to Provide Aid for Taking Possession Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. Bank's Application Allowed as Police Failed to Assist Court Commissioner Despite Magistrate's Order.

22 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Corporation Bank, had advanced loan facilities to M/s. Ankur Iron India Private Limited, which defaulted in repayment. The Bank initia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SARFAESI Auction for Non-Compliance with Undertaking. Failure to Pay Agreed Amount and Challenge Auction Notice After Possession Constitutes Waiver of Right to Challenge Under Section 13(4) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

31 Jan 2005

The petitioners, Mr. Manoj D. Kapasi and Ruby Coach Building Company, owed Rs.3,64,78,000 to respondent No.2 bank. The bank issued a notice under Sect...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

20 Jul 2017

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case, Upholding High Court Order Setting Aside District Magistrate's Decision. District Magistrate's Role Under Section 14 is Limited to Assisting Secured Creditor in Taking Possession, Not Adjudicating Tenancy Disputes, and Tenant's Remedy Lies Under Section 17 Before Debt Recovery Tribunal.

26 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Technical Defect in Demand Notice Not Fatal When No Prejudice Caused. The Court held that a mere inadvertent use of a different group company name on the demand notice does not invalidate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act if the borrower was not misled and no substantial prejudice was caused.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s. L&T Housing Finance Limited (appellant) and M/s. Trishul Developers and another (respondents) concerning ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order as Time-Barred Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act. Limitation Period of 45 Days for Filing Securitisation Application is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended by the Tribunal.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Zen Lifecare Ltd., challenged the orders of the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Ahmedabad, dated 20th November 2020 and 6th February 20...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)