Bombay High Court Directs Police to Provide Aid for Taking Possession Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. Bank's Application Allowed as Police Failed to Assist Court Commissioner Despite Magistrate's Order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Corporation Bank, had advanced loan facilities to M/s. Ankur Iron India Private Limited, which defaulted in repayment. The Bank initiated proceedings under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai. On 14th June 2018, in Case No. 36/SA/2018, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate allowed the application and appointed Advocate Chetna Dattaram Khedekar as Court Commissioner to take over possession of the secured assets. The jurisdictional police were directed to provide police aid to the Court Commissioner if required. The Court Commissioner issued a notice on 24th July 2018 fixing 8th August 2018 as the date for taking possession. However, on that date, the police did not provide the required assistance. The Bank then filed this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents, including the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and the Senior Inspector of Police, Pant Nagar Police Station, to immediately take physical possession and hand it over to the Bank's Authorised Officer. The High Court, after hearing the counsel, held that the police are duty-bound to comply with the order of the Magistrate. The court directed the Senior Inspector of Police, Pant Nagar Police Station, to provide necessary police aid to the Court Commissioner for taking possession of the secured assets as per the order dated 14th June 2018. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) SARFAESI Act - Section 14 - Possession of Secured Assets - Police Aid - The Bank initiated proceedings under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, who allowed the application and appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession, directing police to provide aid. The Court Commissioner issued notice but the police failed to provide assistance on the appointed date. The High Court held that the police are bound to comply with the order of the Magistrate and directed the Senior Inspector of Police to provide necessary police aid to the Court Commissioner for taking possession. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the police authorities are obligated to provide aid to the Court Commissioner for taking physical possession of secured assets under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, after the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate has passed an order appointing a Commissioner and directing police assistance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court directed the Senior Inspector of Police, Pant Nagar Police Station, to provide necessary police aid to the Court Commissioner for taking possession of the secured assets as per the order dated 14th June 2018. The petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Section 14 of SARFAESI Act
  • 2002
  • Police aid
  • Court Commissioner
  • Possession of secured assets
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 139

Writ Petition No. 11729 of 2018

2018-10-22

K. K. Tated, N. J. Jamadar

Ms. Vinaya Chavan i/b Vinaya Chavan & Co. for the Petitioner, Mr. A.A. Alaspurkar, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2

Corporation Bank

The Hon'ble Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Esplanade at Mumbai and Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to police to provide aid for taking possession of secured assets under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner Bank sought a writ, order or direction to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and Senior Inspector of Police to immediately take physical possession of secured assets and handover to the Bank's Authorised Officer.

Filing Reason

Police failed to provide assistance to the Court Commissioner appointed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate for taking possession of secured assets despite the Magistrate's order directing police aid.

Previous Decisions

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate allowed the Bank's application under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act vide order dated 14th June 2018 in Case No. 36/SA/2018, appointing a Court Commissioner and directing police to provide aid.

Issues

Whether the police are obligated to provide aid to the Court Commissioner for taking possession under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act after the Magistrate's order.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner Bank argued that the police failed to provide assistance despite the Magistrate's order, and sought direction for compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

The police authorities are bound to comply with the order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act directing police aid for taking possession of secured assets. Failure to provide such aid frustrates the purpose of the Act and the Magistrate's order.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP. The Bank had advanced loan/extended credit facilities to M/s. Ankur Iron India Private Limited. The learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate passed an elaborate order and, inter alia, appointed Advocate Chetna Dattaram Khedekar as Court Commissioner to take over possession of the secured assets. The Court Commissioner, armed with the order of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, issued a notice on 24th July 2018 and thereby fixed 08th August 2018 as the date for taking possession. The petition is disposed of.

Procedural History

The Bank filed an application under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, who allowed it on 14th June 2018. The Court Commissioner issued notice for 8th August 2018, but police did not provide aid. The Bank then filed this writ petition on 22nd October 2018, which was disposed of on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002: 14
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction - Amendment Sought to Include Claim for Damages and Additional Reliefs. The court permitted the plaintiffs to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, hol...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Police to Provide Aid for Taking Possession Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. Bank's Application Allowed as Police Failed to Assist Court Commissioner Despite Magistrate's Order.