Search Results for "Securitisation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Securitisation"

417 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Pre-Deposit Requirement Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act in Appeals by Borrowers and Secured Creditors. The court held that pre-deposit is mandatory, computed based on the amount claimed in the notice under Section 13(2), excluding future interest, with adjustments for recoveries after filing the petition under Section 17.

23 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a group of appeals, addressed the interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial As...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.

1 Dec 2016

The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Borrowers' Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Sale of Secured Asset Complete Upon Issuance of Sale Certificate, Registration Not Essential. Right of Redemption Under Transfer of Property Act Extinguished Upon Sale Under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act, and Tender of Dues After Sale Date Invalid Under Section 13(8).

20 Aug 2019

The case involves an appeal by borrowers, Shakeena and another, against the Bank of India and others, challenging the sale of their mortgaged property...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order as Time-Barred Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act. Limitation Period of 45 Days for Filing Securitisation Application is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended by the Tribunal.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Zen Lifecare Ltd., challenged the orders of the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Ahmedabad, dated 20th November 2020 and 6th February 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Purchaser's Appeal and Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Redemption Under SARFAESI Act Due to Non-Completion of Sale by Registration. Right of Redemption Under Section 13(8) SARFAESI Act Survives Until Registered Sale Deed, Following Principles of Section 60 Transfer of Property Act.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The dispute arose from the sale of a secured asset under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Secu...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether DRT Mumbai Has Territorial Jurisdiction Under SARFAESI Act When Cause of Action Arises in Mumbai and Secured Property in Gujarat. Interpretation of Sections 17(7) SARFAESI Act and 19(1) RDDB Act and Applicability of CPC Section 16 to Securitization Applications.

15 Dec 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 8 October 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against DRT Order Rejecting Stay of Possession Under Securitisation Act — Section 31(j) Not Applicable to IFCI as It Is Not a Financial Institution Under State Financial Corporations Act.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioners, M/s. Citron Infraprojects Limited and its director, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the De...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SARFAESI Auction for Non-Compliance with Undertaking. Failure to Pay Agreed Amount and Challenge Auction Notice After Possession Constitutes Waiver of Right to Challenge Under Section 13(4) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

31 Jan 2005

The petitioners, Mr. Manoj D. Kapasi and Ruby Coach Building Company, owed Rs.3,64,78,000 to respondent No.2 bank. The bank issued a notice under Sect...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds. Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 as Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Authority Over Securitisation Matters, Despite Allegations of Fraud in Assignment Agreement.

26 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a loan agreement dated 26.07.2011, where the appellant acted as a guarantor for a corporate debtor. After the corporate debtor ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Conditional Deposit in SARFAESI Appeal — Petitioner Directed to Deposit Rs. 1,50,000 for Entertainment of Appeal. The Court held that upon deposit, the Debt Recovery Tribunal must entertain the appeal and decide it on merits, with the deposited amount subject to the outcome.

14 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Ramkrushna Mahadev Bhumbar, a retired individual, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the ac...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)