Search Results for "Section 35G"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Section 35G"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Modvat Credit Dispute — Capital Goods Credit Denial Set Aside. Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 interpreted to allow credit on capital goods used in manufacture of final products, even if not directly used in the manufacturing process.

22 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of various chemical products at its Hazira Manufacturing Complex. The comp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Refund Interest Case — Interest Not Payable for Period Before Completion of Claim Formalities. The Court held that under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944, interest on refund runs only from the date the claimant completes all formalities, not from the date of original incomplete application.

4 Aug 2017

The case involves a Revenue Appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Silvassa against Sterlite Industries Ltd. under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

21 Apr 2021

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Pre-Deposit Order in CENVAT Credit Case — Prima Facie Case for Waiver of Pre-Deposit Established. The Court held that the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the statements relied upon were retracted and no opportunity for cross-examination was given.

8 May 2015

The appellant, Ms. Arjandas Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 10th ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

24 Jan 2018

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

High Court

CENVAT Credit on Exempted Goods Upheld by Bombay High Court. Factual findings and reliance on precedents render Revenue’s appeal untenable.

19 Dec 2024

Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Daman Commissionerate v. Huhtamaki PPL Ltd.Central Excise – CENVAT Credit on exempted goods – Whether c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Intermediate Product Marketability. Court holds that CESTAT failed to consider relevant evidence regarding marketability of loosely assembled fibre web used captively for manufacture of exempted jute carpets.

24 Jun 2014

The appellant, M/s Hitkari Hitech Fibres Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of products under Chapters 56 and 57 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against CESTAT Predeposit Order in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Cases. Electricity Consumption Norms for M.S. Ingots Require Prima Facie Case Assessment for Waiver of Predeposit.

12 Oct 2011

The Bombay High Court heard six appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Strict Compliance Required for Reduced Penalty Under Section 11AC. The benefit of 25% penalty is available only if duty, interest and reduced penalty are paid within 30 days of the original adjudication order, not the Tribunal's order.

25 Jun 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)