Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Refund Interest Case — Interest Not Payable for Period Before Completion of Claim Formalities. The Court held that under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944, interest on refund runs only from the date the claimant completes all formalities, not from the date of original incomplete application.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a Revenue Appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Silvassa against Sterlite Industries Ltd. under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The dispute concerns the payment of interest for delay in sanctioning the respondent's refund claims under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The respondent had filed an original refund claim on 27 September 2004 for Rs.7,11,45,917/-. The Assistant Commissioner raised queries on 3 November 2004, and the respondent revised the claim to Rs.7,13,23,821/- on 8 December 2005. The refund was sanctioned on 9 March 2006 for Rs.6,45,83,460/-, with the remaining amount rejected as time-barred. The respondent claimed interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act for the period from 27 December 2005 to 9 March 2006. The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the interest, leading to the present appeal. The High Court framed the substantial question of law as whether interest is payable for the period 27 December 2005 to 9 March 2006 when the original claim was incomplete and subsequently revised. The Court analyzed Section 11BB, which provides for interest on delayed refunds, and noted that the provision requires the claimant to have completed all formalities. Since the original claim was incomplete and the revised claim was filed on 8 December 2005, the Court held that interest could only run from the date of completion of formalities, i.e., from 8 December 2005, not from 27 December 2005 as ordered by the Tribunal. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and held that no interest is payable for the period in question.

Headnote

A) Central Excise - Refund - Interest - Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - The issue was whether interest is payable for the period between the date of revised claim (08-12-2005) and the date of sanction (09-03-2006) when the original claim was incomplete - The Court held that interest under Section 11BB is payable only from the date of completion of all formalities by the claimant, and since the original claim was incomplete and revised on 08-12-2005, interest runs from that date, not from the original filing date - The Tribunal's order granting interest from 27-12-2005 was set aside (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether interest is payable to the respondent for the period 27-12-2005 to 09-03-2006 on the refund granted under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, even though they had not submitted all relevant documents along with the original refund claim of Rs.7,11,45,917/- filed on 27-09-2004 and which was consequently revised by the respondent to Rs.7,13,23,821/- on 08-12-2005 and sanctioned on 09-03-2006

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad is set aside. The substantial question of law is answered in the negative, i.e., interest is not payable for the period 27-12-2005 to 09-03-2006.

Law Points

  • Interest under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act
  • 1944 is payable only from the date of completion of all formalities by the claimant
  • not from the date of original application
  • when the claim was incomplete and subsequently revised
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (08) 72

Central Excise Appeal No. 26 of 2016

2017-08-04

Anoop V. Mohta, Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the Appellant, Mr. Vishal Agrawal a/w Ms. Isha Shah, Mr. P.K. Shetty i/by P.K. Shetty for the Respondent

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax Silvassa

Sterlite Industries Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Revenue Appeal under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 against order of Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding payment of interest on delayed refund.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (Revenue) sought to set aside the Tribunal's order granting interest to the respondent for the period 27-12-2005 to 09-03-2006.

Filing Reason

The Revenue was aggrieved by the Tribunal's order directing payment of interest on refund despite the original claim being incomplete and subsequently revised.

Previous Decisions

The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad had allowed the respondent's claim for interest for the period 27-12-2005 to 09-03-2006.

Issues

Whether interest is payable under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 for the period 27-12-2005 to 09-03-2006 on refund granted under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 when the original refund claim was incomplete and subsequently revised.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that interest under Section 11BB is payable only from the date of completion of all formalities by the claimant, and since the original claim was incomplete and revised on 08-12-2005, interest cannot run from an earlier date. Respondent argued that interest should be paid from the date of original application or from the date of revised claim as per the Tribunal's order.

Ratio Decidendi

Interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is payable only from the date on which the claimant completes all formalities relating to the refund claim. If the original claim is incomplete and subsequently revised, the date of completion of formalities is the date of the revised claim, not the date of the original application.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a State/Revenue Appeal, filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Admittedly, the refund application was filed on 27 September 2004 for Rs.7,11,45,917/-. The same was sanctioned on 9 March 2006 for Rs.6,45,83,460/-. The issue in the Appeal is regarding payment of interest for delay in sanctioning of the Respondent's refund claims.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a refund claim on 27-09-2004. Queries were raised on 03-11-2004. The respondent revised the claim on 08-12-2005. The refund was sanctioned on 09-03-2006. The respondent claimed interest for the period 27-12-2005 to 09-03-2006. The Tribunal allowed the interest. The Revenue appealed to the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 11BB, Section 35G
  • CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004: Rule 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Refund Interest Case — Interest Not Payable for Period Before Completion of Claim Formalities. The Court held that under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944, interest on refund runs onl...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Sections 20(1), (2), and (3) under the PC&PNDT Act, 1994. Supreme Court upholds High Court ruling, emphasizing that suspension of hospital registration must be grounded in public interest and proper legal procedures.