Search Results for "Section 254 CrPC"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Criminal Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process — Quality of a Nation's Civilization Measured by Methods Used in Enforcement of Criminal Law.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Bhimsen Naik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Husband in Dowry Harassment Case — Petitioner Granted Pre-Arrest Bail Subject to Conditions. Court Held That Custodial Interrogation May Not Be Necessary for Investigation Under Sections 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioner, Avinash Rajanna, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking anticipatory bail ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Accused's Appeal for Cloned Copy of Memory Card in Rape Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Victim's Privacy. Electronic Record Held to be 'Document' Under Evidence Act and IPC, Entitling Accused to Copy Under Section 207 CrPC.

The appellant, P. Gopalkrishnan @ Dileep, was arrayed as accused No. 8 in a case registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...