Search Results for "Section 25(3) Limitation Act"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 2014 Days. Delay of 2014 days in filing first appeal against compensation award not condoned as government failed to provide sufficient cause under Section 5 of Limitation Act.

The present civil application was filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Unit 1 and another under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Applications by State in Land Acquisition Appeals Due to Unexplained Delay of 2014 Days. Delay of 2014 days in filing first appeal against land acquisition award not sufficiently explained, as state failed to provide cogent reasons for each day of delay.

The judgment pertains to a batch of civil applications filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Unit 1 and another (the State) under Section 5 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Unexplained Delay of 2608 Days Not Condonable. The Court held that administrative delays by the State do not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The State of Gujarat and its officers filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of 2608 days delay in fili...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of 718-Day Delay in Filing Appeal by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Reference Cases. Delay Condoned Subject to Costs of Rs. 15,000 per Application Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, presided over by Honourable Mrs. Justice M. K. Thakker, delivered a common oral judgment on 16/01/2026 in a ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit and Upholds Wills in Family Property Dispute. Wills and Codicils Executed by Testator and Testatrix Found Valid, No Undue Influence or Lack of Testamentary Capacity Established.

The judgment concerns a family dispute over the estate of Chimanlal Chinai and his wife Shardaben Chinai. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of Dinkar Chinai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Succession and Title — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership. Succession Certificate Not Conclusive Proof of Title; Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right to Property.

The appellant, Madhukar Venkatesh Ullal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking declaration of title and possession of a property. He claimed t...