Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 2014 Days. Delay of 2014 days in filing first appeal against compensation award not condoned as government failed to provide sufficient cause under Section 5 of Limitation Act.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 133
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present civil application was filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Unit 1 and another under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a delay of 2014 days in filing the first appeal. The appeal challenged the judgment dated 13.12.2019 and award dated 23.12.2019 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijapur, District Mehsana, in Land Acquisition Reference Case No.18 of 2012 arising out of Land Acquisition Case No.31 of 2012, whereby the Reference Court awarded compensation at the rate of ₹228 per square metre for irrigated agricultural land along with all statutory benefits. The learned AGP Ms. Himani Shah appeared for the applicants and reiterated the reasons stated in the application in tabular form, which detailed the chronology of events from the date of the award to the filing of the application. The court noted that the present application was part of a group of civil applications decided by this Court on 19.01.2026 and passed the same order. The court found that the delay of 2014 days was inordinate and the reasons provided did not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Consequently, the application was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Limitation Act - Condonation of Delay - Section 5 - Sufficient Cause - Delay of 2014 days in filing first appeal against land acquisition compensation award - Government applicant failed to provide sufficient cause for inordinate delay - Application dismissed (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay of 2014 days in filing the first appeal against the judgment and award of the Reference Court should be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is dismissed. The delay of 2014 days is not condoned.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Sufficient cause
  • Limitation Act
  • Section 5
  • Land acquisition compensation
  • Government delay
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 759

R/Civil Application (For Condonation of Delay) No. 5197 of 2025 in F/First Appeal/30449/2025

2026-02-26

M. K. Thakker

2026:GUJHC:15698

Ms. Himani Shah (AGP for applicants), Unserved Expired (R) for respondent

Special Land Acquisition Officer, Unit 1 & Anr.

Patel Shankarbhai Gobardas

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil application for condonation of delay in filing first appeal against land acquisition compensation award.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay of 2014 days in filing first appeal.

Filing Reason

Delay in filing appeal due to administrative processing.

Previous Decisions

Reference Court awarded compensation at ₹228 per sqm for irrigated land on 13.12.2019 and award dated 23.12.2019.

Issues

Whether the delay of 2014 days should be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned AGP reiterated reasons in tabular form showing dates of administrative steps taken after the award.

Ratio Decidendi

The delay of 2014 days is inordinate and the reasons provided do not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The present application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a delay of 2014 days in filing the first appeal challenging the judgment dated 13.12.2019 and the award dated 23.12.2019 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijapur, District Mehsana.

Procedural History

The Reference Court passed judgment and award on 13.12.2019 and 23.12.2019. The applicants filed the present civil application on an unspecified date in 2025 seeking condonation of 2014 days delay. The court heard the application on 26.02.2026 and dismissed it.

Acts & Sections

  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 5
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court Quashing Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated Under Rule 55 Civil Services Rules Without Granting Gazetted Officer's Request to Refer Case to Administrative Tribunal. Rule 4(2) of U.P. Disciplinary Proceedings (Administ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Unsigned MOU for Flat Purchase. Contract Not Concluded as Essential Terms Were Not Finalized and MOU Remained Unsigned.