Search Results for "Section 16(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 16(1)"

2264 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2264 result(s)

High Court

High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.

1 Jun 2019

The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Against TDS Notices Issued to Turf Clubs Under Section 194B of Income Tax Act — Argued That Stake Money Is Not Winnings. Petitioners Contend That CBDT Circular No.467 Exempts Stake Money From TDS and That Such Payments Are Business Income Taxable Under Section 74A, Not Winnings Under Section 194B.

26 Sep 2014

The batch of writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore arose from notices issued by the Income Tax Department to turf clubs in Ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Revenue's Appeal Against Tribunal's Direction to Use Municipal Rateable Value for Determining Annual Letting Value Under Section 23(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court Examines Whether Comparable Market Instances or Municipal Valuation Should Prevail When Property Is Not Subject to Rent Control Legislation.

8 Aug 2014

The matter comprised multiple income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging common orders of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.

14 Jun 2011

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for TCS in Income Tax Case — Lack of Fresh Material and Change of Opinion. Reopening under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as reasons recorded were based on same material considered during original assessment, constituting mere change of opinion.

27 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., challenged a notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

27 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)