Search Results for "Section 154 Evidence Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Section 154 Evidence Act"

594 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 594 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Malafide Prosecution. Allegations of Rape on False Promise of Marriage Found Baseless as Relationship Was Consensual and Complaint Filed After Civil Dispute.

30 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Arunkumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and Section 528 of the Bharatiya...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Government Officer in Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Private Complaint Filed Without Prior Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servant is Not Maintainable.

4 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok V., a District Officer in the Backward Classes Welfare Department, challenged an order dated 07.12.2021 passed by the Princi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil Procedure Amendment Case Regarding Mortgage Redemption Suit. The court upheld the lower courts' orders allowing amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, holding that issues of limitation and res judicata should be decided at trial, not at the amendment stage.

14 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from a property in Ballia, where the plaintiffs claimed ownership of a shop and filed Suit No. 154 of 2009 for possession upon ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff to Cross-Examine Hostile Witnesses Called by Defendant in Money Suit — Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The trial court's order treating DWs 3 and 4 as hostile and permitting the defendant to cross-examine them was set aside as premature and prejudicial to the plaintiff.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Rajiv Vijaysarathy Rathnam, is the plaintiff in a money suit (O.S.No.1305/2013) pending before the XLI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengalu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Plaintiff's Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order Permitting Cross-Examination of Hostile Witnesses in Money Suit. The court held that Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, allows the court to permit cross-examination of a witness by the party who called him if the witness appears hostile, and such discretion is not limited to witnesses called by the opposite party.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Rajiv Vijaysarathy Rathnam, is the plaintiff in a money suit (O.S.No.1305/2013) pending before the XLI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengalu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.

1 Oct 2019

The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Land Acquisition Map Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Upheld. The court held that a suit challenging a land acquisition map is not barred by Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as the map is not an award.

26 Feb 2018

The petitioner, original defendant No.7, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Street Scheme Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1969 and Completed in 1986 Cannot Be Challenged After 14 Years Without Justification.

11 Aug 2017

The dispute relates to the acquisition of land bearing field Survey Nos.147/2, 153, 154/1, 2 and 3, 155, 156 and 156/1, admeasuring about 10.10 acres,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer's Failure to Produce Attendance Records Leads to Adverse Inference. The court held that non-production of attendance registers by the employer under Section 28 of MRTU and PULP Act warrants an adverse inference under Section 114(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, entitling employees to regularization.

23 Jan 2013

The appellants, Rama Atmaram Dahiwal and Mahadeo Karbhari Shinde, were daily wage employees of the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (respondent). They f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Registration of New Cooperative Society Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — No Violation of Natural Justice Found as Petitioner Failed to Show Prejudice. The Court held that even if there was a breach of natural justice, the petitioner must demonstrate prejudice, which was not done.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Hiradgaon Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd., an existing cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging the registra...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)