High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Income Tax Appeals Filed by Assessee and Revenue Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Multiple Appeals Clubbed for Hearing Involving Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005.
25 Mar 2015...
Search Results for "Section 100 Companies Act 2013"
906 result(s) found
Found 906 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation Bar — Winding Up Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Default Date Cannot Be Revived Under IBC. The Court held that a time-barred winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be treated as a valid Section 7 application under the IBC, and the filing of a suit for specific performance does not extend limitation for a winding up petition.
25 Sep 2019The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the admission of a winding up petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The pet...
- 301
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging SFIO Investigation Order in Company Law Non-Compliance Case Involving Family Demerger Dispute. The Court considered whether order dated 6 May 2016 directing investigation into affairs of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited under Section 633 and Article 226 should be quashed amid ongoing litigation.
5 Oct 2016The writ petition was filed by majority shareholders of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited, a Kolkata-based sponge iron manufacturer, against the Add...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Alteration of Share Capital — Interim Relief Granted to Protect Plaintiff's Rights Pending Suit. The court held that the plaintiff, a director, had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting interim injunction against the company and other directors regarding the alteration of share capital from Rs.5,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in the Memorandum of Association.
1 Aug 2017The case involves a dispute within a family-owned company, H. Fillunger & Company Pvt. Ltd., where the plaintiff, Ajit Arvind Marathe, a director, fil...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.
30 Nov 2022The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...
- 59
High Court
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Guarantee and Pledge Against Company Pending Company Law Board Proceedings. Alleged Fraudulent Assumption of Liability by Directors Without Shareholder Consent Raises Serious Questions to be Tried.
15 Jul 2013The applicant, Rajinder Kumar Malhotra, filed an application in a pending company appeal seeking an interim injunction to restrain HDFC Bank from reco...
- 69
High Court
Karnataka High Court Adjudicates upon Writ Petitions Challenging Re-Assessment Proceedings for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2007-08. Court Analyzes Whether Notices are Barred by Limitation and Whether Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts.
19 Dec 2023The petitioner, EIT Services India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Hewlett Packard Globalsoft Private Limited), a company engaged in export of software services a...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Defamation Process in Companies Act Special Notice Case. The Dispute Involves Allegations Made in a Statutory Notice Under the Companies Act, 2013.
22 Jul 2019Background: The present writ petition arose from a criminal defamation complaint filed by Respondent No.2, Nusli Neville Wadia, against the petitioner...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.
22 Aug 2022The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...
- 47
