KAHC010068412019_1
16 Aug 2019...
Search Results for "Rule 137"
1153 result(s) found
Found 1153 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Specific Performance Suit to Add Alternative Claim for Damages and Refund. Amendment seeking alternative relief of damages and refund in lieu of specific performance does not introduce a new cause of action and is not barred by limitation under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.
6 Feb 2013The appeal arose from a decision of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 6 March 2012, allowing an amendment to the plaint in a suit ...
- 87
High Court
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will Dated 1977 Despite Limitation and Forgery Challenges. Executor Succeeds in Proving Due Execution and Testamentary Capacity of Testator Who Died in 1979.
2 Dec 2016The plaintiff, Suresh Manilal Mehta, filed a petition for probate of a Will dated 16th March 1977 allegedly executed by Rameshchandra Jamnadas Dalal (...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Trial Court's Order Allowing Additional Witnesses in Abduction and Murder Case. Section 311 CrPC Discretion Upheld as No Prejudice to Accused When Cross-Examination Opportunity Given.
27 Jun 2019The applicants, Kalpesh Ramnath Saroj @ Chhotu and Ravindrakumar Ramhatai Yadav, were accused in Sessions Case No.743 of 2012 pending before the Addit...
- 16
High Court
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Allowing Impleadment in Suit for Possession — Revision Not Maintainable Under Section 83(9) of Wakf Act, 1995. The court held that Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, 1995 bars the application of CPC to Tribunal proceedings, and thus revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Vinod Khimji Lodaya, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) before the Bombay...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Property Dispute Due to Limitation. Delay of Over 3 Years in Challenging Ex-Parte Decree Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Held Not Sufficiently Explained.
13 Jul 2005The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the Plaintiff/Applicant, Smt. Gopi, widow of Tarachand R. Advani, seeking to set aside an ex-parte order ...
- 248
High Court
Bombay High Court Deliberates on Applicability of Limitation Act to Appeals Before Collector Under Section 137 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Issue Centered on Whether Collector is a 'Court' for the Purpose of Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.
21 Dec 2006The writ petition arose from a demand notice dated 23 June 2003 issued to the petitioner, proprietress of Vishal Liquors, an ex-CLII licensee, for an ...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.
29 Oct 2013The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...
- 89
