Search Results for "Requisitioning Act"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Equal Passing Criteria for Project Affected Persons in Government Recruitment -- Petitioner's Claim for Separate Treatment Under PAP Category Rejected

The Petitioner, a Project Affected Person, sought appointment in Group C cadre under the Project Affected Persons category after failing a recruitment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for COVID-19 Insurance Cover Due to Death After Cut-Off Date. The court held that the scheme's cut-off date of 30th June 2021 must be strictly applied based on the date of death, not the date of infection.

The petitioner, Ramesh Balu Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to quash the order dated 24th May 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Election Commission's Order to Use College Premises for Polling Stations. Educational institutions cannot refuse to provide premises for election purposes under Article 243K and Section 26 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The first petition was filed by Shri Gadge Maharaj Mahavidy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Implementation of De-hiring Policy for Defence-Occupied Premises. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to enforce de-hiring policy against Union of India for flats occupied since 1944 under lease agreements.

The petitioners, Kaikobad Byramjee and Son (Agency) Private Limited and Mr. Khushrooh P. Byramjee, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Cou...