Search Results for "Related witness"

1390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Criminal Petition, Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Deferment of Cross-Examination Under Section 231(2) Cr.P.C. -- Accused in IPC Offences Including Section 302 Granted Relief to Prevent Prejudice in Defence Disclosure

The petitioners, accused in a sessions case involving grave offences under the IPC, sought deferment of cross-examination of witnesses under Section 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellants in Criminal Appeal. Conviction Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Goa Children's Act, 2003 Set Aside Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Property Dispute

The Appellants, were convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Section 504 and 324 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Bus Driver's Negligence Established by Preponderance of Probabilities. Non-examination of Pillion Rider Not Fatal to Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 28 October 2011, when Sitaram, a senior government school teacher, was riding a motorcycle with a pillion rid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 342 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or circumstantial evidence.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 302 and 342 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants, Nijamuddin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The appellant, Sukumar Kallappa Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Sections 307 (attempt to murd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC, Acquits Co-Accused for Lack of Common Intention. Conviction based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence; acquittal of others due to absence of proof of common object under Section 149 IPC.

The case involves three appeals arising from a single judgment of the trial court. The appellant Ishwar Baliram Hude was convicted under Sections 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Five Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and evidence suffered from material contradictions and improvements.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by five accused persons convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rasiklal Makhanji Solanki, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Vidya Prabhudesai by pouring kerosene and setting her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly and Common Object.

The case involves multiple appeals against conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 400 of 2004. The appellan...