Search Results for "Regular Promotion"

460 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 460 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in ACP Scheme Dispute — Deployment as Radio Telephone Operators Held Not a Promotion. Reorganisation of Posts Without Selection Process Does Not Disentitle Employees to Assured Career Progression Benefits Under Office Memorandum Dated 9.8.1999.

The appellants, Telephone Operators with the Delhi Fire Service (DFS), were deployed as Radio Telephone Operators (RTOs) in a higher pay scale followi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Teacher Promotion Case — C&V Teachers Not Entitled to TGT Quota for Headmaster Post. Rule 9(5) of Haryana School Education (Group C) State Cadre Service Rules, 2012 only gives notional conversion to TGT cadre, not eligibility for promotion against TGT quota.

The State of Haryana appealed against a Division Bench order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had allowed writ petitions filed by Sandeep Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Regularisation of Ad-hoc Promotion in Konkan Railway. No Legal Right Established Without Rules or Policy.

The petitioner, Sreekumar G., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to quash an order dated 28.06.2013 and to declare that his ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...