Search Results for "Recreational Open Space"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Recreational Open Space"

104 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 104 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

8 Apr 2026

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Order Protecting Open Spaces in JVPD Scheme. Layout Reservation of 1967 Prevails Over Development Plan of 1999 Under DCR.

17 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against the Bombay High Court judgment that declared two plots in JVPD Scheme, Mumbai, as mandatory open spaces an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Amenity Development Under Appendix 'W' of Thane Municipal Corporation Development Regulations. Petitioner entitled to Transferable Development Rights for developing amenity space on surrendered plot under Clause 6 of Appendix 'W'.

6 Aug 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Cosmos Realtors Joint Venture, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Flat Purchase Dispute — Upholds Dismissal of Suit Challenging Additional Construction. Court holds that flat purchasers cannot enforce sanctioned layout plans against developer in absence of express contractual covenant or statutory obligation under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

25 Jan 2019

The appellant, Shri Vitthal Laxman Patil, was a flat purchaser in a project called 'Kores Nakshatra' developed by Kores (India) Ltd. Real Estate Divis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Possession in Property Dispute — Unregistered Agreements for Sale of Tenanted Premises Held Invalid for Want of Registration Under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908. The court held that unregistered conveyances do not confer title and cannot be used to claim possession against tenants.

8 Apr 2015

The plaintiff, Parwan Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for possession of Unit No.1C admeasuring 976 sq. ft. against the defendants, claiming owner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking TDR for Land Acquired Under MRTP Act — Transferable Development Rights Claim Barred by Limitation as Application Filed Beyond Reasonable Period After Possession. The court held that a claim for TDR under Section 126(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 must be made within a reasonable period, and a delay of seven years from the date of possession disentitles the claimant.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Karan Developers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Pune Municipal Corporati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Encroachment Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act — Orders Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. The Court held that the Collector must afford a hearing before declaring a vacancy under Section 16 read with Section 14(1)(j3) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

4 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Shantaram Narayan Raut, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Vinchur, in 2010 and subsequently became Sarpanch. Respondent N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Minister's Permission for Development on Recreational Ground in Public Interest Litigation. Section 47 MRTP Act Appeal Allowed Without Proper Application of Mind and Contrary to Development Plan Reservation.

10 Jun 2011

The judgment arises from a public interest litigation filed by residents living around the Cooperage plot in Mumbai, represented by the Oval Cooperage...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Entrustment of Playground Land to Samiti for Development and Maintenance. Municipal Corporation's Decision to Entrust Land on Caretaker Basis for Playground Construction Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 63 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

23 Feb 2006

The appellants, Sarvajanik Shri Ganeshotsav Mandal and its president Sanjay Sawant, filed an appeal against the dismissal of their writ petition by a ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)