Search Results for "Railway Rates Tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Railway Rates Tribunal jurisdiction"

142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Termination of Services Agreement by State Assembly Secretariat Held Illegal by Arbitrator; Court's Decision on Frustration and Party Distinctness Not Available in Provided Excerpt.

25 Nov 2025

Background: The dispute arose from an agreement dated 5 December 2015 between the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly (UPLA) Secretariat and Tata Consu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Commercial Arbitration Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award on Royalty Liability for Earthwork. Liability for Royalty on Ordinary Earth Used in Embankment Held by Arbitral Tribunal to be Borne by Employer, Section 34 Petition Filed Challenging Interpretation of Contract Clauses.

14 Nov 2025

The matter involved a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to a majority arbitral award dated 22nd May 2020 arisin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Railway Accident Claims Cases — Appellants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 82A of the Railways Act, 1890 for Death of Minors in Untoward Incidents. The court held that the death of minors falling from trains constitutes an untoward incident under Section 82A of the Railways Act, 1890, and awarded Rs. 1,00,000 each to the appellants.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to three first appeals filed by the appellants against the Union of India, through the General Manager, Central Railway, Bombay,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Awards in Information Technology Upgrade Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Awards Granting Refund and Rejecting Counter Claims.

6 Feb 2015

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by CMC Limited (original respondent in the arbitration) impugnin...

High Court

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 499 OF 2012

14 Oct 2014

The appeal before the High Court arose out of an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissing the assessee's appeal and upholdi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in NHAI Contract Dispute — BOQ Rate Applies to Increased Quantity Without Design Change. Variation Clause 52.2 Not Attracted Where Quantity Increase Due to Employer's Erroneous Estimate, Not Engineer's Instruction or Design Change.

20 Feb 2025

The dispute arose out of a contract awarded by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to Somdatt Builders-NCC-NEC(JV) for four-laning of a hi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court Judgment Dismissing Challenge to Arbitral Award in Bill Discounting Dispute — Contractual Interest Rate of 36% Per Annum with Monthly Rests Upheld. High Court's Upholding of Arbitral Award on Interest Rate Based on Mutual Agreement Between Commercial Parties and Not Opposed to Public Policy.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a bill discounting facility extended by the respondent to a seller (BDDL) and buyer (appellant) of goods. The appellant and BDD...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Directing Shift of Toll Plaza for Violation of National Highways Fee Rules. Construction at 194 km of NH30 Found to Violate Rule 8 of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 Due to Lack of Written Reasons and Failure to Meet Conditions for Municipal Area Placement.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by respondents 1 to 17 (writ petitioners) seeking to restrain the construction of a toll plaza at 194 km ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)