Search Results for "Ossification Test"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Allegation Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses Under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Sundaram, was convicted by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri, for offences under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor — Life Sentence Confirmed. Court holds that minor inconsistencies in victim's testimony do not undermine credibility when corroborated by medical evidence and prompt complaint.

The appellant-accused, Tabrez Rojuddin Ansari, was convicted by the learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Special POCSO Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Age Determination Based on School Register Not Conclusive Without Ossification Test

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Jerabhai Lalabhai Thakore and another accused by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Ten-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Despite Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Amol S/o Raju Nindekar, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Age of Victim and Offence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Palaspagar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati for offences under Sections 363, 366, and 376 IPC. The pros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor — Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Devanand Rajabhau More, was convicted by the Special Court, Ambajogai, in Special POCSO Case No. 4/2014 for offences under Sections 363...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Workers Challenging Superannuation Based on Medical Board Age Determination. Medical Report Prevails Over Unverified Seniority List Entries for Illiterate Workers Under Industrial Disputes Act.

The petitioners, Vithabai w/o Govind Pawale and Hussainabi Diwankhan, were daily wage workers employed by the Forest Department. They joined duties on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Conviction Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 376(2)(f) IPC for raping an 11-year-old girl; appeal dismissed as prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohamed Farid Jafer Shaikh, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 376(2)(f), 342, 363 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Sister-in-Law by Brother-in-Law in Rape Case — Evidence of Victim Credible Despite Lack of Medical Evidence. The court held that the sole testimony of the victim, if credible, is sufficient to sustain a conviction under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Mohd. Sharif, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 376 and 506 (Part I) of the I...