Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 166"

1016 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1016 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Apportionment of Liability Between Insurers Upheld. Claimant allowed to amend petition from Section 163A to Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and compensation enhanced from Rs. 4,50,000 to Rs. 8,50,000 with interest.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Smt. Omana Chetan, widow of S.R. Chetan, who died in a road accident involving a lorry and a car....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Covered Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Held that the expression 'any person' in Section 163-A includes a pillion rider and that the petition is maintainable even in a hit-and-run case.

The appellant, Lalita wd/o Rajkumar Sawalkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which was later converted to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Conversion of Claim Petition from Section 163A to Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Remand for Fresh Adjudication. Claimants permitted to convert claim petition at any stage, including after remand, as per settled law.

The petitioners, original claimants in a motor accident claim, filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, following th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Claim Petition Beyond Limitation in Motor Accident Case — Tribunal Has Power to Entertain Delayed Claim After Omission of Section 166(3). The Court held that the omission of Section 166(3) does not affect pending claims and the Tribunal retains inherent power to condone delay.

The petitioner, Kum. Jyoti Manohar Shetye, a socially engaged citizen employed with the Bombay Port Trust, participated in a bicycle ride from Mumbai ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Driver's Own Negligence Not Covered Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Tribunal's finding of employment and salary set aside; penal interest direction modified.

The case arises from a claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the dependents of Nazir Beg, who died in a motor acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Legal Representatives to Continue Appeal Under Section 166(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166(5) Held Retrospective, Applies to Pending Appeals Where Claimant Died Before Amendment.

The case involves two appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 07.03.2011 in MVC Nos.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Income Exceeding Limit Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claim Petition Under Section 163-A Held Not Maintainable as Deceased's Annual Income Exceeded Rs.40,000/- Prescribed Limit.

The appellant, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 10/03/2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribun...