Search Results for "Minerals Concession Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Minerals Concession Rules"

88 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Allotment Under KIAD Act, Upholding Allotment to Highest Bidder. Petitioner's Claim to Land as Successor to Mining Lease Rejected as Previous Court Orders Concluded Against It and Allotment Was Lawful Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by M/s Katwa Udyog Limited (KUL) challenging the allotment of land measuring 305 acres and 7 guntas at Na...

High Court

High Court Quashes Central Government Order Requiring Mining Company to Stop Operations and Obtain Prior Approval Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Mining Lease Renewal Not Requiring Fresh Approval Under Section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as Lease Area Was Already Diverted for Non-Forest Use.

29 Apr 2025

The petitioner, The Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Limited, a mining company, challenged a communication dated 29 January 2014 issued by the Ministry ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tahsildar's Orders for Vehicle Seizure and Demand of Royalty for Sand Transportation Beyond Permit Time. Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Impose Penalty Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for Violation of Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1963.

17 Oct 2022

The petitioners, owners of vehicles transporting sand, challenged show cause notices and final orders passed by the Tahsildar demanding payment of roy...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Corrigendum to Extend Quarrying Lease Period from 5 to 20 Years Under Rule 8-A of KMMC Rules, 1994. Deemed Extension of Lease Period for Non-Specified Minor Mineral Granted Under Amended Rule 8-A(4) of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

24 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Sri K.M. Ramaswamy, was granted a quarrying lease for 2.20 acres in Sy.No.47 of Naduvanahllai Village, Chikkaballapur Taluk, Chikkabal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Interim Stay in IBC Matter — Questions of Maintainability of Writ Petition and NCLT's Power to Inquire into Fraud Examined. The court held that the High Court should not have entertained a writ petition against an NCLT order when a statutory appeal to NCLAT was available, and that NCLT can inquire into fraud under Section 60(5)(c) of IBC, 2016.

3 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court heard three appeals arising from an interim order of the Karnataka High Court staying the operation of a direction by the National C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under MMDR Act. Petitioner/Accused No.1 Charged Under Section 379 IPC and Sections 21, 22 of MMDR Act for Alleged Theft of Sand – Proceedings Quashed as Cognizance Without Required Sanction Under Section 22 of MMDR Act is Invalid.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri Rudrappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Interim Orders Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Arbitration Procedure. The court held that the learned Principal District Judge lacked jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the applicant failed to comply with the mandatory pre-arbitration conciliation procedure agreed upon in the contract.

6 Jun 2017

The petitioners, Mineira Nacional Limitada and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 13.01.2016 and 29.11.2016 passed by the lear...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revisional Authority's Order Cancelling Mining Lease — Notification Under Section 17A(1A) of MMDR Act Upheld. State Government's Grant of Mining Lease Without Prior Central Approval Invalid Under Section 17A(1A) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

26 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Vidarbha Mining Association, a partnership firm, applied for a mining lease for 69.10 hectares of land in village Chikhla, Taluka Tums...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application for Appointment of Receiver in BOT Road Contract Dispute. The court held that the appellant contractor had a prima facie case and was entitled to appointment of a receiver to collect tolls pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Nov 2013

The appellant, Ashoka Buildcon Ltd., a construction company, entered into a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) contract with the State of Maharashtra for im...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)