KAHC010403282026_2
23 Jul 2026The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged the award of a rate contract for supply of Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite Solution 5% 5ltr (drug code 430) ...
Search Results for "Metro rail"
193 result(s) found
Found 193 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Compensation Payment for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail Project - No Objection Letter Required from Housing Board. Landowner's Entitlement to Compensation Recognized Based on Allotment Order and Sale Deeds Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
19 Feb 2026The petitioner, M. Krishnaveni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second r...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MMRDA's Petition for Mangrove Removal for Coastal Road Project Subject to Conditions. Court holds that removal of mangroves for a public infrastructure project is permissible under the CRZ Notification, 2011, provided that compensatory mangrove afforestation is carried out and environmental safeguards are complied with.
12 Sep 2025The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) seeking permission to remove mangr...
- 33
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of Employee Due to Lack of Safety Measures. Employer and Principal Employer Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
23 Aug 2025The appeal was filed by the claimants, the legal representatives of the deceased Chinnaswamy, who died due to electrocution on 14.08.2013 while workin...
- 34
High Court
Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village.
2 Feb 2025The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Neutral Arbitrator in Railway and Airport Authority Contracts — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid. Arbitration clause providing for appointment by General Manager or officer of the same entity violates Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
27 Mar 2024The judgment concerns three matters: two arbitration applications and one arbitration petition, all raising a common question about the validity of ar...
- 66
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.
21 Apr 2022The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...
- 111
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows University's Appeal in Delay Condonation Case — Sets Aside High Court Order, Directs Hearing on Merits. Delay of 916 days in filing LPA condoned as University's decision-making process involving Executive Council and expert committees constituted sufficient cause under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.
17 Dec 2019The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the University of Delhi against a common judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 29.10.2018, which declined...
- 314
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.
27 Feb 2019The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...
- 193
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...
- 40
