Search Results for "Material Alterations"

268 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 268 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Public Servants in Jail Sepoy Recruitment Scam Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Alleged Acts of Tampering with Marks Were Part of Official Duties, No Prima Facie Case of Criminal Conspiracy Made Out.

The Bombay High Court allowed a batch of writ petitions challenging the rejection of discharge applications by the Special Judge in a corruption case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Action to Remove Unauthorized Vertical Extension in Notified Slum. Unauthorized Construction Cannot Be Protected Merely Because It Is Situated in a Slum Area.

The appellant, Mujibur Rehman Chaudhary, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay challenging a notice dated 31 December 2019 issued by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Construction and Nuisance. Tenant's unauthorized permanent alterations and nuisance to other occupants justified eviction under Bombay Rent Act.

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute where the landlord filed a suit for eviction of the tenant from the suit premises under Sections 12 and 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Trust Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for recall of witness under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, as the application was filed after a long delay and lacked bona fides.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sau. Sumita Pradeepkumar Dixit (original defendant No. 4) against the Gangadhar Makharia Chari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...