Search Results for "Mandate Termination"

415 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 415 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ONGC Against Upholding of Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Interpretation of Contract Terms and Findings of Fact by Arbitral Tribunal Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arises from a commercial arbitration appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment of a Single Judge of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for De Facto Inability to Perform Functions. Arbitrator's Order Returning Statement of Claim and Rejecting Application for Termination of Mandate Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Amar Tea Distributors, a partnership firm, entered into a Distributor Agreement with the respondent, Coca-Cola India Pvt. Ltd., on 7th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Termination of Arbitral Proceedings and Constitute New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 9 and 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause Shown by Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner.

The petitioners, Neeta Lalit Sanghavi and Hemanshu Lalit Sanghavi, are the legal heirs of the deceased partner, Lalitkumar Vanmalidas Sanghavi. They f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Daily Wage Workers Seeking Reinstatement Under Kalelkar Award. Workers Held Not Covered by Award but Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation Under Chapter VA of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15.10.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Substitution of Arbitrator in Sports Contract Disputes Under Sections 11 and 15(2) of Arbitration Act. Arbitrator's failure to render award within statutory period and subsequent resignation justified substitution despite respondent's objection.

The judgment concerns a group of arbitration applications filed under Section 11 and Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Arbitrator's Order Rejecting Interim Relief — Holds That Arbitrator Must Consider Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Before Refusing Interim Injunction.

The appellant, Spice Digital Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Being Beyond Stipulated Time — Arbitration Clause Mandates Award Within Four Months of Entering Reference, Failure Renders Award Void.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 17th August 2006 on the ground...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Suspended Police Officer Due to Non-Review Under Rule 3(8) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Continued suspension beyond 90 days without mandatory review renders suspension illegal and without authority of law.

The State of Maharashtra and the Director General of Police filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Labour Court's Direction to Reinstate Workman with Full Wages Pending Complaint Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October 2005, which dismissed its revision...