Search Results for "Mamlatdar’s Court Act, 1906"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Mamlatdar's Courts Act Case Upholding Revision Order Quashing Tahsildar's Directions. Tahsildar Exceeded Jurisdiction by Issuing Directions Affecting Non-Party Without Hearing Under Section 5 of Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906, Violating Natural Justice Principles.

The dispute originated from Rasta Case No. 54 of 2020 filed by respondent no. 4 against the petitioners before the Tahsildar, Parner under Section 5 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Mamlatdar's Courts Act Orders Due to Procedural Defects and Lack of Substantive Findings. Tahsildar's Order Granting Way Access Under Section 5 Set Aside as Applications Failed to Specify Obstruction Details and Panchnamas Were Conducted Without Proper Notice.

The dispute concerned proceedings under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 regarding access to agricultural lands. The petitioners were landowners whose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge Order in Land Dispute, Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits. The Court held that the Single Judge erred in directing mutation based on an unadjudicated family arrangement without hearing the appellant.

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from an order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Application No. 892...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Rules on Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order on Tenancy Claim Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The decision addresses the validity of the tenancy declaration under Section 70(b) and Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, who claimed to be Watandars, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order passed by the Maharashtra Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Under Mamlatdar Court's Act for Non-Compliance with Affidavit Requirement. Application for Right of Way Dismissed as Plaint Not Supported by Affidavit as Mandated by Section 5 of Mamlatdar Court's Act, 1906.

The petitioners, owners of Gat No.257, challenged orders passed under the Mamlatdar Court's Act, 1906, which granted a right of way to the respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...