Search Results for "Maharashtra Civil Services Rules 1982"

557 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 557 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Held that aided non-government educational institutions are bound to adopt government pension scheme for employees who retired after the cut-off date.

The petitioners, thirteen retired employees of Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Polytechnic, Amravati (respondent No.4), which is run by Shivaji Education Socie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Retired Medical Officer Challenging Denial of Pension After Conviction for Heinous Offences. Departmental Enquiry Initiated After Retirement Under Rule 27(2)(b)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 Upheld as Valid.

The petitioner, Dr. Santram s/o Mitharam Rathod, was a Medical Officer in the Public Health Department of Maharashtra, appointed on 7 June 1982. He wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Counting of Past Service for Pensionary Benefits of Superannuated Employee. Past service rendered in a government-aided institution prior to joining government service is liable to be counted for pension under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Shri Ashok Dattatraya Marathe, a superannuated employee of the State Government, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Service for Time Bound Promotion Should Be Reckoned from Initial Appointment or Regularisation Date. Government Resolution and Supreme Court Precedents on 'Regular Service' Interpreted in Context of TBPS and ACPS.

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturer's Petition for Pension and Arrears in Service Dispute. Removal for Misconduct Disentitles Employee to Pensionary Benefits Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Kulkarni Shashikant Bhavani, was appointed as a lecturer in Physical Education at B.P.C.A's College of Physical Education (respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Compassionate Appointment for Heirs of Employee Retired on Invalid Pension. Rule 80 Retirement and Exclusionary G.R. Held Arbitrary and Unconstitutional.

The case involves a challenge by the State of Maharashtra against an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) allowing the original appl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Lack of Integrity and Efficiency. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to prematurely retire a District Judge based on adverse entries and overall performance record.

The petitioner, Ashokkumar Hiralal Lohiya, was a judicial officer who joined the judiciary as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in 1978 and was promoted ...