Search Results for "Maharashtra APMC"

171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Secretary of Agriculture Produce Market Committee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Violative of Section 44(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Deorao S/o Bhujangrao Fuke, was serving as the Secretary of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Majalgaon, District Beed....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging APMC Nagpur Election Process and Government Orders Extending Board Tenure

The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions and a contempt petition concerning the elections and administration of the Agricultural Produce Marke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal Order of APMC Chairman for Non-Compliance with Section 17 of Maharashtra APMC Act — Resolution Not Passed by Requisite Majority. The court held that the requirement of a resolution by at least 10 members is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with.

The petitioner, Sharad Bapuraoji Deshmukh, was an elected Director and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Wardha. The District Dep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Inclusion of Dry Fruits Under APMC Act — Notifications Ultra Vires. Definition of Agricultural Produce Under Section 2(a) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is Exhaustive and Does Not Include Dry Fruits/Dry Dates.

The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing in dry fruits and dry dates, challenged the validity of notifications dated 20.6.1988 and 18.10.1988 issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Addresses Reference on APMC Election Eligibility of Gram Panchayat Members. Reference Pertains to Interpretation of Sections 13(1)(a)(ii) and 15 and Rule 36 for Former and Current Gram Panchayat Members.

The matter came before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, on a reference made by a learned Single Judge in a batch of writ p...