Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

581 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 581 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Disproportionate Punishment. Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment Under MRTU and PULP Act Upheld — Permanent Stoppage of Increments for Outraging Modesty Found Disproportionate.

16 Aug 2016

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, which had set aside the punishment of perman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Employee Seeking Impleadment in Union Recognition Proceedings — Employee's Resignation from Union Does Not Confer Locus Standi to Intervene in Recognition Application Under MRTU & PULP Act.

26 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Shri Gireesh U.G. Menon, was an employee of M/s. Crawford Bayley & Co. and a former member of the Mumbai Mazdoor Sabha (Respondent No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Rejection of Complaint Under MRTU and PULP Act — Petitioner Fails to Prove Unfair Labour Practice as Termination Was Not by Employer. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the petitioner did not establish the employer-employee relationship with the respondents, and the termination was due to closure by the principal employer, not an unfair labour practice under Item 1 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Bhagwandas Shankerlal Rathi, filed a complaint under Section 28 read with Item 1 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Rejection of Complaint Under MRTU and PULP Act — Employee Fails to Prove Unfair Labour Practice in Denial of Promotion and Pay Scale. The Court held that the burden of proving unfair labour practice lies on the complainant and mere filing of complaint without evidence of discrimination or mala fides cannot sustain a claim under Item 1 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Bhagwandas Shankerlal Rathi, filed a complaint under Section 28 read with Item 1 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trad...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court’s Recognition of Trade Union Under MRTU & PULP Act. Recognition Granted Based on Retrospective Membership Payments Raises Question of Legal Validity.

3 May 2006

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 3 March 1998 of the Industrial Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Labour Court Order Holding Termination of Trainees as Unfair Labour Practice. Trainees performing regular work for over 240 days deemed permanent workmen under Model Standing Orders, termination without Section 25F compliance illegal.

11 Jul 2018

The petitioners, M/s Mukand Limited and others, challenged an order of the Labour Court at Thane and the revisional order of the Industrial Court at T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Industrial Court Order Dismissing ULP Complaint for Non-Implementation of Labour Court Award. Doctrine of Election Permits Employee to Choose Remedy Under MRTU & PULP Act Despite Availability of Execution Under ID Act.

9 Mar 2022

The petitioner, Dhannu Bhagu Rathod, was a workman who had his termination challenged before the Labour Court in Reference (IDA) No.2/2015. The Labour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint — Permanent Stoppage of Increments Set Aside as Disproportionate. The Industrial Court, under Section 30 of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, can set aside a punishment if it is shockingly disproportionate to the misconduct, even if the domestic enquiry was valid.

3 May 2014

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenging an order of the Industrial Court, whic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case Due to Denial of Termination. Employer's Affidavit Stating No Termination Occurred Renders Complaint Under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 Infructuous.

1 Sep 2016

The petitioner, M/s Satish Motors Limited, challenged an order of the Labour Court directing it to deposit three months' wages in a complaint filed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Individual Workmen's Complaints for Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Dismissed Complaints Holding Recognised Union Had Exclusive Right to File Such Complaints, and High Court Finds Need for Factual Adjudication on Merits.

29 Jul 2005

The writ petitions arose from a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 13-3-1996, which dismissed 63 workmen's complaints seeking perman...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)