Search Results for "Labour Welfare Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Labour Welfare Officer"

534 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages for Security Inspectors. Employer's Failure to Lead Evidence and Participate in Conciliation Justified Adverse Inference Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Group Four Security Services India Pvt. Ltd., a security agency, challenged the judgment and award dated 27/08/2018 passed by the Labo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for Computation of Minimum Wages. Labour Court erred in dismissing claim for difference in wages on ground of limitation and lack of adjudication of entitlement.

21 Sep 2020

The petitioner, Shri Tularam Manikrao Hadge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 29.07.2019 passed by the Labour Court, Nag...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal's Award Directing Permanent Absorption of 2700 Sweepers and Loaders Engaged in Solid Waste Management. The Case Involves Determination Whether Workers Who Performed Essential Statutory Duties for Over 240 Days Are Entitled to Regularization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Despite Being Engaged Through Intermediaries.

22 Dec 2016

The Mumbai Municipal Corporation, established under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Correctness of Century Textile Interpretation on 'Unprotected Worker' Under Maharashtra Mathadi Act. Referred Question Seeks to Determine Whether Only Casually Engaged Workers Are Covered by the Act Under Section 2(11).

30 Aug 2006

The Bombay High Court Full Bench was constituted to resolve a conflict arising from differing interpretations of Section 2(11) of the Maharashtra Math...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Petition of Social Forestry Department Against Reinstatement Order — Back Wages Set Aside. Department of Social Forestry Held to Be an Industry Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Reinstatement Upheld but Full Back Wages Denied for Lack of Evidence.

8 Jan 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Deputy Director, Department of Horticulture & Social Forestry, Nagpur, and the Plantation Officer again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Hospital's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices. The court upheld that unilateral change in service conditions of employees without notice under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 constitutes unfair labour practice under Items 5, 9, and 10 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

5 Jun 2023

The case involves a writ petition filed by Bhatiya General Hospital and its CEO against an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which found the peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that without a notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, contract labour cannot be deemed employees of the principal employer, and the Labour Court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing absorption.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 passed by a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No. 3...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contract Workmen's Wage Parity Claim Against Principal Employer. Existence of Agreement with Representative Union Precludes Non-Members from Claiming Higher Wages Under Contract Labour Act.

20 Apr 2023

The petition was filed by Mumbai Electric Employees Union, a non-representative union of contract workmen, challenging the order of the Additional Lab...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)