Search Results for "Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation"

59 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Local Body Tax Dispute — 'Disputed Tax' Under Section 406(8) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act Does Not Include Interest or Penalty. Pre-deposit condition for appeal satisfied by depositing only the tax amount, not interest or penalty.

The petitioner, Wintry Engineering And Chemicals Private Limited, challenged an order dated 22 February 2024 passed by the Commissioner of Local Body ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Municipal Permission Case — Withdrawal of Permission for Body Building Competition Held Arbitrary. Model Code of Conduct Cannot Be Used to Revoke Already Granted Permission Without Justification.

The petitioner, Vijay Jagannath Salvi, a social worker, sought to organize a Body Building Competition at Late Jayanta Nathu Devlekar ground. The Kaly...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notices Under Section 212 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 for Lack of Prior Approval of Standing Committee. Delegation of Power by Standing Committee to Commissioner Held Invalid as Standing Committee Lacks Statutory Authority to Delegate.

The petitioners challenged notices and orders issued under Section 212 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 by the Kalyan Dombivli Muni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee is already aware of the closure of the establishment.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Municipal Council, Tirora, and its President against common orders passed by the Labour C...