Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Municipal Permission Case — Withdrawal of Permission for Body Building Competition Held Arbitrary. Model Code of Conduct Cannot Be Used to Revoke Already Granted Permission Without Justification.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vijay Jagannath Salvi, a social worker, sought to organize a Body Building Competition at Late Jayanta Nathu Devlekar ground. The Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) granted permission on 11.01.2023. However, on 17.01.2023, the KDMC withdrew the permission citing the Model Code of Conduct of the Election Commission, which was already in force when the permission was granted. The petitioner challenged this withdrawal as arbitrary. The court observed that the permission was granted despite the Code being in force, and the withdrawal communication did not indicate that the earlier grant was erroneous. The court held that the withdrawal was an afterthought and arbitrary. It set aside the communication dated 17.01.2023 and directed the KDMC to permit the event subject to usual conditions, including compliance with law and order, noise pollution, and traffic regulations. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Model Code of Conduct - Withdrawal of Permission - The Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation had granted permission to the petitioner to hold a Body Building Competition on 11.01.2023, but later withdrew it on 17.01.2023 citing the Model Code of Conduct of the Election Commission. The court held that the withdrawal was arbitrary as the permission was granted when the Code was already in force, and the communication did not state that the earlier grant was wrong. The court set aside the withdrawal and directed the Corporation to permit the event subject to usual conditions. (Paras 5-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the withdrawal of permission to hold a Body Building Competition on the ground of the Model Code of Conduct being in force was arbitrary and illegal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, set aside the communication dated 17.01.2023, and directed the KDMC to permit the Body Building Competition subject to usual conditions regarding law and order, noise pollution, and traffic. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Model Code of Conduct
  • Election Commission guidelines
  • arbitrary withdrawal of permission
  • municipal corporation powers
  • fundamental rights
  • freedom of assembly
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 164

Writ Petition No. 892 of 2023

2023-01-20

Sunil B. Shukre, M. W. Chandwani

2023:BHC-AS:3018-DB

Mr. R. S. Datar a/w Mr. Dushyant Pagare a/w Ms Druti Datar for Petitioner, Mr. A. S. Rao for Respondent No. 1, Ms M. P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No. 2

Vijay Jagannath Salvi

Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation, The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging arbitrary withdrawal of permission to hold a Body Building Competition.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of the communication dated 17.01.2023 withdrawing permission and direction to permit the event.

Filing Reason

The KDMC withdrew permission granted on 11.01.2023 citing the Model Code of Conduct, which was already in force at the time of grant.

Previous Decisions

Permission was granted on 11.01.2023 and withdrawn on 17.01.2023.

Issues

Whether the withdrawal of permission on the ground of Model Code of Conduct was arbitrary and illegal.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the permission was granted despite the Code being in force, and withdrawal was an afterthought. Respondent KDMC submitted that the Code prohibited such events.

Ratio Decidendi

The withdrawal of permission was arbitrary because the permission was granted when the Model Code of Conduct was already in force, and the withdrawal communication did not state that the earlier grant was wrong. The court held that the Corporation could not revoke a validly granted permission without proper justification.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a case wherein the concerned officer of the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation had granted permission to the party of the Petitioner on 11.01.2023 to organize and hold a Body Building Competition at Late Jayanta Nathu Devlekar ground. the communication dated 17.01.2023 issued by the KDMC, almost as an after thought the permission so granted has been withdrawn by the concerned officer of the KDMC on the ground that Code of Conduct of the Election Commission, being in force, no permission can be granted to the Petitioner to organize a Body Building Competition. This communication, it is pertinent to note, does not mention that permission granted earlier was wrong

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 892 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court challenging the withdrawal of permission. The court heard the matter on 20.01.2023 and disposed it at the admission stage with consent.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Municipal Permission Case — Withdrawal of Permission for Body Building Competition Held Arbitrary. Model Code of Conduct Cannot Be Used to Revoke Already Granted Permission Without Justification.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and In-camera Statements Renders Detention Invalid