Search Results for "KVAT Rules"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Canara Bank's Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encumbrance Created by Commercial Tax Department on Mortgaged Property. Priority of Bank's Mortgage Over Statutory Charge Under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Upheld.

The petitioner, Canara Bank, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in Sales Tax Case — Revisional Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 8(3)(b) of CST Act, 1956 Quashed as Assessee Was Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Driver of Vehicle.

The appellant, M/S Apotex Research Private Limited, an assessee under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed a Sales Tax Appeal under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Service Tax Demand on Payment Aggregator Services for FY 2015-16. Services Provided by FIS Payment Solutions to Acquiring Banks for Settlement of Card Transactions Held Not Taxable as 'Business Auxiliary Service' Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, FIS Payment Solutions and Services India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, provides payment aggre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT Dispute — Inter-State Sale of Rough Granite Blocks Not Proven as Export Sale. Assessee failed to discharge burden of proof under Section 5(1) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision in VAT Case — Running Bills of Water Supply Board Not Tax Invoices. Karnataka Water Supply Board is not 'Government' under KVAT Rules, hence its Running Bills cannot be treated as Tax Invoices for input tax credit.

The State of Karnataka filed a Sales Tax Revision Petition under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in KVAT Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Assessee Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Third Party. Section 39(1) Reassessment Set Aside as Assessing Authority Relied on Ex-Parte Statements Without Providing Opportunity to Rebut.

The petitioner, M/s. TTP Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a registered company represented by its Director Sri. M. Devarajaiah, filed writ petitions under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Appeals Against Reassessment Notice Under KVAT Act Due to Lack of Jurisdiction — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 52(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

The appellant, M/s Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd., engaged in construction, supply, erection and commissioning of cooling towers, was issued a notice un...