Search Results for "Insider Trading"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 15J Factors Illustrative in SEBI Penalty Adjudication. Adjudicating Officer Retains Discretion to Consider Mitigating Circumstances Beyond Stipulated Factors Under SEBI Act.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a reference arising from multiple civil appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 15J of the Securities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge by SEBI Employees Association to Direct Recruitment and Deputation of Executive Directors; Holds that Section 9 of SEBI Act, 1992 Confers Unrestricted Power on Board to Appoint Officers of Its Choice, and Regulations Cannot Fetter This Power.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the SEBI Employees Association along with individual Chief General Managers challenging the Securities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer Order in ONGC — No Violation of Service Rules Found. Transfer order issued on administrative grounds upheld as petitioner failed to establish mala fides or breach of transfer policy.

The petitioner, Rajinder Paul Bharadwaj, was working as Manager (MM) in the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) at Mumbai. He was transferred ...