Search Results for "Inadvertent error"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Inadvertent error"

263 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 263 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Department's Appeal in Customs DFIA Scheme Conversion Case. Circular No.36/2010 Held Directory, Not Mandatory, Allowing Amendment of Shipping Bills Beyond Time Limit.

10 Apr 2026

The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Export) against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Exemption Case — Remands for Fresh Consideration of Registration Under Section 12AB of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the rejection of exemption registration was procedurally flawed as the Assessing Officer failed to consider the appellant's reply and the order was passed without proper application of mind.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Uttar Bhartiya Education Society, is a trust/society running educational institutions. It applied for registration under Section 12AB o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of Deputy Superintendents of Police — Transfer Orders Issued by Competent Authority in Public Interest Not Vitiated by Alleged Malafides or Non-Consideration of Representations. The court held that transfer is an incident of service and judicial interference is not warranted unless the order is malafide or violates statutory rules, and that the petitioners had an alternative remedy before the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal.

15 Oct 2025

The petitioners, ten Deputy Superintendents of Police serving in various capacities in the Karnataka Police Department, filed a writ petition under Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.

19 Dec 2024

The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Bid in Mining Lease e-Auction, Orders Fresh Auction and Penalty. Supreme Court finds error in 140.10% bid to be a genuine mistake, mandates a fresh e-auction while imposing a Rs 3 crore penalty on appellant for lack of due care.

15 Jul 2024

Granted leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Orissa, which dismissed the writ petition of the appellant who had mistakenly placed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Pre-emption Suit to Deposit Deficit Amount Due to Bona Fide Error and Court's Own Mistake. The Court held that the power to extend time under Section 148 CPC exists, and the appellants should not suffer for a calculation error where the court itself directed deposit of the incorrect amount.

3 May 2024

The case involves a pre-emption suit filed by the appellants' predecessor-in-interest against the respondents. The suit was decreed on 11.08.1988, req...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Rafale Procurement Case, Corrects Factual Error in Judgment. The Court held that the review petitions did not disclose any error apparent on the face of the record and that the scope of judicial review under Article 32 in procurement matters is limited to examining the decision-making process, pricing, and offsets.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment on a review petition and miscellaneous applications arising from its earlier judgment dated 14.12.2018...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

3 Aug 2019

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Patent in Annuity Payment Dispute — Petitioner's Failure to Pay Annuities Due to Bona Fide Mistake and Lack of Proper Communication from Patent Office. Court held that the Patent Office must give notice before treating a patent as ceased and that the petitioner's application for restoration should be considered on merits under Section 60 of the Patents Act, 1970.

10 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Teijin Limited, a Japanese corporation, was the grantee of Patent No. 207883 in India. The patent was granted on 24th October 2003. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Probate Schedule by Prothonotary. Prothonotary has power to allow amendment of schedule of assets in probate proceedings under Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

11 Oct 2013

The petitioners, Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Bharat Ramanlal Gokal, filed a petition under the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of the Bombay Hig...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)