Search Results for "IPC 124-A"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Son and Wife in Land Fraud Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC quashed as no prima facie case made out against family members who were not involved in the alleged transaction.

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashment of FIR No.I-11199050220914 of 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in NIA Case for Failure to File Chargesheet Within 90 Days. Section 21(4) of NIA Act, 2008 read with Section 167(2) CrPC mandates release on bail if investigation not completed within statutory period.

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, was arrested on 14.04.2020 in connection with FIR No. RC 01/2020/NIA/Mum registered by the National Investigating A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in PMLA Case Seeking Venue Change from Lucknow to Ernakulam. Transfer Under Section 406 CrPC Not Granted as Accused Failed to Establish Exceptional Circumstances or That Place of Predicate Offence Determines PMLA Trial Venue Under Section 65 PMLA.

The Supreme Court considered a transfer petition filed by an accused in a Prevention of Money-laundering Act (PMLA) case seeking to transfer the proce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon Case Under UAP Act. Court Finds No Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act or Conspiracy Against Senior Professor.

The appellant, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, a senior professor and chair of Big Data Analytics at Goa Institute of Management, was arrested as accused No.10 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad Case Under UAP Act. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 and Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Section 43D(5) Bar.

The appellant, Hany Babu, a professor and academic, was arrested on 28 July 2020 in connection with FIR No. 1 of 2020 registered by the National Inves...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in Unlawful Activities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act. Applicants Granted Pre-Arrest Bail Under Section 438 CrPC as Allegations of Waging War Against Government and Unlawful Activities Not Substantiated.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking anticipatory ba...