Search Results for "ICC Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "ICC Rules"

49 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows MTNL's Appeal Against Arbitration Order in Bond Dispute with Canara Bank. The Court held that arbitration proceedings cannot continue without a written arbitration agreement and without the consent of all necessary parties, specifically CANFINA.

8 Aug 2019

The case involves a dispute between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and Canara Bank regarding bonds issued by MTNL. In 1992, MTNL floated bonds ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Nestle India's Writ Petitions Challenging Licence Suspension Under Food Adulteration Act — Suspension Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. The Court held that the Licensing Officer's order suspending the petitioner's licence under Section 32-A of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 was passed without affording an opportunity of hearing, thus violating principles of natural justice.

29 Jun 2012

The petitioner, Nestle India Limited, a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and marketing food products, held a licence under the Preventi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Termination of Procurement Agreement. Pre-Arbitral Negotiation Clause Held Not Mandatory Condition Precedent Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Apr 2019

This is an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Tech Mahindra Ltd. against Tata Communications Transfor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in International Arbitration Agreements. Supreme Court Rules on Applicability of Indian Law and Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Arbitration Disputes

18 Mar 2025

Governing Law of Arbitration Agreement: The Court applied the three-step test from Sulamérica Cia Nacional De Seguros S.A. v. Enesa Engenharia S.A....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge's Order in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Parties Did Not Exclude Part-I of Arbitration Act by Choosing Foreign Law and Seat Abroad. The Court held that under the Bhatia International regime, Part-I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to international commercial arbitrations held outside India unless expressly or impliedly excluded, and mere choice of foreign law and seat does not constitute implied exclusion.

6 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15 November 2011, which held that the Court had no jurisdict...

High Court

Court Quashes TISS Rustication Decision Over Jurisdictional Overreach. Appellate Authority directed to reconsider appeal focusing solely on social media post issue, separating unrelated sexual harassment allegations.

8 Jul 2024

The petitioner, a student at Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), was rusticated due to a social media post targeting the Dean and Internship Coo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

11 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Foreign Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — Seat of Arbitration Determined as London, Not India. Parties' Choice of English Law and London Arbitration Excludes Indian Courts' Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Sakuma Exports Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, entered into a contract dated 12 January 2010 with the respondent, Louis Drefus Commoditi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Relief in Favor of Media Rights Licensee in Arbitration Dispute with BCCI. Court holds that Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, grants power to grant interim measures to protect the subject matter of the arbitration, and the learned Single Judge correctly exercised jurisdiction to restrain termination of the Media Rights Licensing Agreement pending arbitration.

27 Feb 2012

The case involves three appeals arising from an order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court on 19 January 2012, granting ad interi...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract and Prior Section 9 Filing at Salem Confer Jurisdiction on Salem Courts Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Apr 2026

The revision petitioner, Waterbury Farrel, a division of Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc., Canada, filed Arb.O.P.No.103 of 2019 before the Principa...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)