Search Results for "Group Grampanchayat"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Group Grampanchayat"

113 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

22 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Disqualification Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Levy of house tax by Sarpanch on structures within Gram Panchayat limits is a statutory duty and does not constitute misconduct under Section 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

11 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Anita Dhammapal Bodade, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wadiadampur, Tahsil Telhara, District Akola. Respondent No.2, Devid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. No-confidence motion invalid as three-day notice not given to Sarpanch and motion not properly moved for voting.

22 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. On 22.12.2023, an extraordinary meeting was...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch; Meeting Convened Within Two Days Valid Under 1975 Rules. Special meeting for no-confidence motion under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act and the 1975 Rules does not require three clear days' notice as per Rule 4 of Meetings Rules 1959, and meeting held within seven days is sufficient.

2 Jul 2018

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Kawalgaon, Taluka Degloor, District Nan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Nomination Forms for Grampanchayat Election Due to Non-Substantial Defect. The court held that omission to mention ward name while mentioning ward number is not a defect of substantial character under Rule 11(2A) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Election Rules, 1959.

10 Jun 2005

The case involves three writ petitions filed by candidates whose nomination forms for the election to Nimdari Grampanchayat, scheduled for 19th June 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Panchayat Member for Non-Disclosure of Property Tax Dues. Failure to disclose outstanding property tax dues and obtain no-dues certificate renders election void under Section 14(1)(j) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

18 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Shaukat Ali Mohd. Hussain, challenged the election of respondent No. 1, Shaikh Ayub, as a member of the village panchayat of Badnapur ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Failure to Move Resolution in Special Meeting Renders Motion Invalid and Attracts Bar Under Section 35(3-A) Against Fresh Motion for One Year.

9 Nov 2023

The petitioners, Savita Shrimant Ghule (Sarpanch) and Ganesh Vishnu Hagawne (Upa-Sarpanch) of Grampanchayat Ukkadgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Local Authorities Members Disqualification Act, 1986 — Disqualification Order Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Application of Mind. The court held that the disqualification authority must apply its mind to the allegations and evidence, and pass a reasoned order; mere reproduction of complaint and absence of finding on voluntary giving up of membership renders the order invalid.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Ratnamala Ashokrao Shinde (Sarpanch) and Bandu Raghunath Panchlinge (Upa-Sarpanch) of Grampanchayat Palodi, were disqualified by the ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)