Search Results for "Fundamental Rule 53(2)"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reservation for SC/ST in Direct Recruitment to District Judge Posts — Backlog Vacancies Filled by Lowering Cut-Off Marks Valid Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by general category candidates challenging the decision of the High Court of Judicature at Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Rule 17(2) of the PAN Rules, 2019 in GST Registration Cancellation Case. Rule requiring PAN Aadhaar linking for GST registration revival is intra vires the Finance Act, 2017 and not violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Raju Laxman Pachhapure and Amit Pramod Minache, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Amendment Order in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought Changed Nature of Suit and Was Barred by Limitation. Order 6 Rule 17 CPC amendment cannot be allowed if it introduces a new case beyond limitation period and alters the character of the suit.

The petitioners, Fr. Ralin De Souza and Ashley Do Rosario, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26.02.2016 passed by the learned Civil Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Order Quashing Shortlisting Criteria for Civil Surgeon Selection. Held that prescribing higher qualification not advertised violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The case involves two writ petitions challenging a common judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 27 January 2014. The Tribunal had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Grievous Hurt in Domestic Violence Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen and Medical Testimony Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302 and 326 IPC.

The appellant, Babu Kunchankuch Vagalil, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai at Sewree in Sessions Case No.10...