Search Results for "Food Safety and Standards Act 2006"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Food Safety Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors cannot be held liable under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 without specific averments of their role in the offence.

The petitioners, including a company and its erstwhile directors, challenged an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, which dismissed their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal from Order Maintainable Against Food Safety Appellate Tribunal Decisions Under Section 71(6) of FSS Act, 2006. The Court ruled that appeals lie to the civil side of the High Court and can be filed as an Appeal from Order under Section 104 CPC read with Order 43 Rule 1.

The State of Maharashtra, through its Food Safety Officer, filed an Appeal from Order before the Bombay High Court challenging a judgment and order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Secretary in Food Safety Violation — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Role. Secretary Not Present at Sampling, Complaint Lacks Averment of Responsibility Under Section 59 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The applicant, Hemant Sukaji Funde, was the Secretary of Gurukrupa Adiwasi Prathmik and Madhyamik Ashramshala, Thana, Amgaon, Gondia. He was arraigned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Food Adulteration Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 — Groundnut Oil Sample Found Adulterated. Accused's Conviction for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil and Carrying on Business Without License Confirmed by Appellate and Revisional Courts.

The case involves two criminal revision applications filed by Jairam Shadija, the accused, challenging the order dated 28.08.2015 passed by the learne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Licensing Requirement for Food Business — Holds That MMC Act and FSS Act Can Coexist Without Repugnancy. Section 394(1)(e) of MMC Act, 1888 is Not Void Under Article 254 as It Operates in a Different Field of Municipal Regulation.

The petitioner, Sanjeev Rajaram Chimbulkar, a food business operator, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Seeking Ban on Sale of Gutka and Pan Masala in Margao. Court holds that existing statutory framework and enforcement mechanisms are adequate, and no further directions are required.

The petitioner, Sanjeev Shrinivas Pai Raiturkar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking a ban on the ...