Search Results for "Findings of fact"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Land Procurement Dispute — Refund of Rs.91 Lakhs Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Land Procurement Under MOU.

The petitioner, Manvel Tuscano, sole proprietor of M/s. Manvel Land Empire, and the respondent, DLF Limited, a real estate developer, entered into a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Pipeline Construction Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Findings of Fact and Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12% Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Mahanagar Gas Limited, awarded a work order to the respondent, M/s. Babulal Uttamchand & Co., for project management and construction o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds single judge's refusal to set aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to challenge.

The Union of India (appellant) had invited tenders for construction work, and Moti Enterprises (respondent) was the successful tenderer. The contract ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Court declines to frame substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC as findings of fact by lower appellate court were not shown to be perverse.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed two second appeals against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court in a suit for specific perf...