Search Results for "Film City"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Film City"

150 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Frivolous PIL Seeking Multiple Unrelated Directions Including Anti-Organized Crime Unit, Cow Farms, and Cave Temple Commission. Petition Filed by Self-Styled Criminologist Lacks Factual Basis and Legal Foundation, Wasting Judicial Time.

19 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Crimeophobia – A Criminology Firm through its founder, Snehil Dhall, who...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction Application Against Film Release in Copyright Infringement and Breach of Confidence Dispute. No Prima Facie Case of Substantial Similarity Between Plaintiff's Script and Final Film Established.

20 Aug 2015

The plaintiffs, Narendra Mohan Singh (proprietor of Sanjay Singh Films) and Manish Jha, filed a suit seeking an injunction against the release of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Copyright Infringement Claim Against Film 'Umeed' — No Substantial Similarity Found. Court holds that ideas and themes are not copyrightable under the Copyright Act, 1957, and that the plaintiff failed to establish access or copying.

15 Jan 2020

The plaintiff, Shivani Tibrewala, a writer/director, filed a suit alleging copyright infringement by the defendants, Rajat Mukherjee and others, in re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

6 Apr 2026

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Cause of Action and Abuse of Process. Plaintiff failed to identify any protectable work or substantial similarity with defendant's film, leading to dismissal with costs.

2 Aug 2016

The plaintiff, Akashaditya Harishchandra Lama, filed a suit for copyright infringement seeking an interim injunction to restrain the release of the fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Municipal Corporation's Power to Regulate Hoardings on Railway Property. Petitions seek declaration that Railway Properties exempt from local authority jurisdiction under Railways Act, 1989.

21 Dec 2017

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India (Western Railway) and numerous private advertising entities. The pet...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in MFA No. 4257 of 2026 Filed by Actor Darshan Challenging Dismissal of Injunction Against Release of Film 'BOSS' - Impact on Fair Trial and Personality Rights Considered. Appeal arises from trial court order dated 02.06.2026 dismissing application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC in OS No. 2151/2026.

17 Jul 2026

Background: The appeal arose from a suit filed by film actor Darshan Srinivas and his wife against Siri Productions and others, seeking a permanent in...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Reserves Verdict on Stay of Film ‘Black Friday’ Amid Pending Trial in 1993 Blasts Case. Accused Argues Docudrama Constitutes Contempt and Defamation, Violates Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21.

31 Mar 2005

The writ petition was filed by Mushtaq Moosa Tarani, accused No. 44 in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts trial (Bombay Blast Case No. 1 of 1993), under the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Interim Directions in Drunk Driving PIL Pending Appeal Against Acquittal of Actor. Court Notes Large Number of Recent Cases Under Section 185 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Directs Interim Measures.

7 Jan 2016

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) arises from an incident on 28 November 2002 in Mumbai, where the fourth respondent, a popular Hindi film star, w...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)