Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction Application Against Film Release in Copyright Infringement and Breach of Confidence Dispute. No Prima Facie Case of Substantial Similarity Between Plaintiff's Script and Final Film Established.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiffs, Narendra Mohan Singh (proprietor of Sanjay Singh Films) and Manish Jha, filed a suit seeking an injunction against the release of the film 'Manjhi – The Mountain Man', directed by Ketan Mehta and produced by Maya Movies Private Limited, Viacom 18 Motion Pictures, and National Film Development Corporation. The plaintiffs claimed that the second plaintiff had written a script on the life of Dashrath Manjhi, which was shared with the third defendant, Mahendra Jakhar, in confidence. They alleged that the film infringed their copyright and breached confidence. The court examined the plaintiffs' script and the film, finding no substantial similarity. The court noted that the plaintiffs' script was a basic outline, while the film's script was detailed and independently developed. The balance of convenience favored the defendants, as the film was set for release the next day and an injunction would cause significant harm. The court dismissed the notice of motion, allowing the film's release.

Headnote

A) Copyright Law - Infringement of Script - Prima Facie Case - The court considered whether the plaintiffs' script was substantially similar to the final film to warrant an injunction. Held that a comparison of the plaintiffs' script and the film did not reveal substantial similarity, and the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of copyright infringement (Paras 1-10).

B) Breach of Confidence - Confidential Information - Prima Facie Case - The plaintiffs alleged that they shared a basic screenplay with the third defendant in confidence. The court found that the plaintiffs did not sufficiently demonstrate that the information was confidential or that there was a breach, as the film's script was independently developed (Paras 11-15).

C) Injunction - Balance of Convenience - Film Release - The court weighed the balance of convenience, noting that the film was scheduled for release the next day and that an injunction would cause irreparable harm to the defendants. Held that the balance of convenience was in favor of the defendants, and no injunction was granted (Paras 16-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case for an injunction restraining the release of the film 'Manjhi – The Mountain Man' on grounds of copyright infringement and breach of confidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Notice of Motion dismissed. No injunction granted against the release of the film 'Manjhi – The Mountain Man'.

Law Points

  • Copyright infringement
  • breach of confidence
  • prima facie case
  • balance of convenience
  • substantial similarity
  • idea-expression dichotomy
  • screenplay copyright
  • film release injunction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 96

Notice of Motion (L) No. 2071 of 2015 in Suit (L) No. 778 of 2015

2015-08-20

G.S. Patel, J.

Mr. D. D. Madon, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Ashish Kamat, Mr. M. Behl & Ms. Viloma Shah i/b Hariani & Co. for Plaintiffs; Mr. V. Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Rohaan Cama, Mr. Rahul Jain & Ms. Mamta Kadam i/b RES Legal for Defendants 1 and 2; Mr. Sharan Jagtiani a/w Mr. Anuj Menon i/b Desai & Diwanji for Defendant 3; Mr. V. R. Dhond, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Amit Naik & Mr. Vaibhav Bhure i/b Naik Naik & Co. for Defendants 4 and 5

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit seeking injunction against film release for copyright infringement and breach of confidence.

Remedy Sought

Injunction restraining the release of the film 'Manjhi – The Mountain Man'.

Filing Reason

Plaintiffs alleged that the film infringed their copyright in a script and breached confidence.

Previous Decisions

On 6th August 2015, Justice Kathawalla directed filing of affidavits and posted for hearing.

Issues

Whether the plaintiffs have a prima facie case of copyright infringement. Whether the plaintiffs have a prima facie case of breach of confidence. Where the balance of convenience lies.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiffs argued that they shared a basic screenplay with the third defendant in confidence and that the film infringed their copyright. Defendants argued that the film's script was independently developed and not substantially similar to the plaintiffs' script.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of copyright infringement or breach of confidence, and the balance of convenience favored the defendants as the film was scheduled for imminent release.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application for an injunction against the release on Friday, 21st August 2015 of a film 'Manjhi – The Mountain Man' directed by the 1st Defendant, Ketan Mehta. At this stage I am required to consider whether there is a prima facie case made out on these grounds as between the film and the Plaintiffs’ script.

Procedural History

Suit filed on 1st August 2015. Ad-interim relief application moved on 6th August 2015. Justice Kathawalla directed filing of affidavits and posted for hearing. Notice of Motion heard on 20th August 2015 and dismissed.

Acts & Sections

  • Copyright Act, 1957:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Execution Dispute — Award Under 1940 Act Cannot Be Enforced Under 1996 Act. Court holds that arbitration agreement entered into before 1996 Act came into force is governed by the 1940 Act, and award...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction Application Against Film Release in Copyright Infringement and Breach of Confidence Dispute. No Prima Facie Case of Substantial Similarity Between Plaintiff's Script and Final Film Established.