Search Results for "Exempted Goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Exempted Goods"

265 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 265 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

18 Feb 2025

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case: EOU Job Work for DTA Unit Without Export Violates EXIM Policy. The Court held that a 100% EOU cannot undertake job work for a DTA unit and clear finished goods to the DTA without exporting them, and such clearance is not eligible for concessional duty under Notification No.8/97-CE.

6 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur against the CESTAT order that allowed the appeals of M/s Universal Ferro & A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Dispute — Holds That Credit on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Goods Is Not Permissible Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002. The Court Resolves Conflict Between Earlier Decisions by Distinguishing MODVAT and CENVAT Schemes, Denying Credit for LSHS Used as Fuel in Producing Exempted Fertilizer.

3 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court to resolve an apparent conflict between two decisions: Commissioner of Central Ex...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that the condition of 'direct physical handling' of goods by the applicant is not a mandatory requirement under the Foreign Trade Policy and that the Policy does not prohibit third-party procurement or supply.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

High Court

High Court Allows Revision in KVAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Assessee Entitled to Compute ITC on Books of Account and Claim Rebate for Research Division Purchases. The court held that the assessee could compute input tax credit based on books of account under Sections 11, 14, 17 of KVAT Act and was entitled to rebate for purchases by its ancillary research division.

26 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Set-Off Under Rule 41D for Export Sales of Exempted Pens. The court held that exemption notifications under Section 41 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 do not bar the claim for set-off under Rule 41D of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 for export sales of fountain pens and ball pens.

14 Oct 2014

The case involves two sales tax references (No.12 and 13 of 2006) filed by M/s. Anand International, a partnership concern manufacturing, selling, and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Airport Operator's Challenge to Customs Regulation Requiring Bill of Entry for Export Goods. Regulation 5(2) of Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 Held Intra Vires Customs Act, 1962 and Constitutional.

13 Oct 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Mumbai International Airport Private Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Regulation 5(2) of the Handling o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition Against Rebate Claims for Export of Yarn — Revisional Authority's Order Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 35-EE of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the revisional authority has the power to condone delay in filing revision application, and the High Court will not interfere with such discretionary order under Article 226.

3 May 2006

The petitioners, the Commissioner of Central Excise and the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)