Search Results for "Eviction proceedings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Eviction proceedings"

1669 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1669 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Writ Petition by Tenant Challenging Eviction Decree Under Bombay Rent Act; Dispute Involves Alleged Encroachment, Nuisance, and Non-User in Koregaon Park Property. Petition Challenges Concurrent Findings of Small Causes Court and District Court Directing Handover of Vacant Possession of Bungalow 'Gardenia' on Grounds Under Sections 13(1)(a), 13(1)(b), 13(1)(c), 13(1)(k) of Bombay Rent Act, 1947.

4 Apr 2024

This writ petition arose from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning a bungalow known as 'Gardenia' at House No. 108, Koregaon Park, Pune. The petitione...

High Court

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 427 OF 2009

3 Nov 2025

The case concerns eviction proceedings initiated by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) against the occupant, Niloufer Marshall, in respect ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree Under Bombay Rent Act — Purchaser of Property Entitled to Benefit of Pending Eviction Suit Without Fresh Notice. Assignment of Landlord's Interest During Pendency of Suit Under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC Allows Assignee to Continue Eviction Proceedings Based on Original Notice of Default.

28 Jun 2006

The petitioners, Ramesh Silk Mills & Ors., were tenants of premises that were the subject of an eviction suit filed in September 1979 by the original ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Decrees on Grounds of Unauthorized Subletting, Bonafide Requirement, and Default in Rent Payment. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on unauthorized subletting, bonafide requirement, and default under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 were upheld as no jurisdictional error was found.

11 Oct 2024

The dispute pertains to eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord-respondent against the tenant-petitioners in respect of a shop premises in Kolh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree Under Section 13A(1) of Bombay Rent Act for Bona Fide Requirement of Landlord's Son. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interferable Under Section 115 CPC as No Jurisdictional Error Found.

11 Aug 2005

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the eviction decree pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Writ Petition in Eviction Suit — Reverses Appellate Court's Dismissal for Non-Prosecution. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Suit Block Established; Tenant's Irregular Rent Payment Proved.

6 May 2022

The petitioner, Abdul Gani, was the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 195/2013 seeking eviction of the respondent-tenant, Dilip Gopaldas Duwani, fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Tenant's Acquisition of Alternate Premises Not Proven and Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement Not Established. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the trial court and appellate court that the landlord failed to prove grounds for eviction under Sections 13(1)(l) and 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

21 Dec 2018

The petitioners, Ranjanwadi Shikshan Trust and others, as landlords, filed a civil suit (Civil Suit No. 18 of 1979) seeking eviction of the respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Orders Under C.P. and Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. Court upholds concurrent findings of Rent Controller and Appellate Authority that quit notices were validly served and tenants failed to establish subletting or bona fide need.

13 Sep 2022

The petitioners, original tenants of a shop premises, challenged the eviction orders passed by the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority under t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant’s Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case, Upholding High Court’s Interpretation of Proviso to Section 57(2) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. High Court Correctly Held That the Proviso’s Exception for Premises to Which Section 54 Does Not Apply Excludes Premises Governed by the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956, Thus the Repealed Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 Applied, and Eviction for Substantial Damage Was Proper.

27 Feb 1969

The dispute concerned a shop in Kinari Bazar, Delhi, rented by the appellant tenant from the respondent landlord. The tenant, who sold sewing machines...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)