Search Results for "Employees Provident Funds Act"

326 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 326 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes EPF Tribunal Order for Non-Supply of Enquiry Report to Employer Under Section 7-A of the EPF Act. Violation of Natural Justice Principle Requiring Supply of Enquiry Report Before Determining Provident Fund Dues.

The petitioner, a co-operative sugar factory, challenged the order of the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal which dismissed its appeal agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Multi State Co-operative Bank's Petition Against Provident Fund Coverage. The court held that the bank's own provident fund scheme, being more beneficial than the statutory scheme, exempts it from the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, The Ratnakar Bank Ltd., a Multi State Co-operative Bank, filed a Writ Petition seeking a declaration that it is not covered under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds EPF Demand Against Regional Rural Bank for Uncovered Employees. Exclusion Under Section 16(1)(c) of EPF Act Not Applicable as Bank's Pension Scheme Did Not Cover All Workers, Following Pawan Hans Precedent.

The dispute arose from a demand by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation for provident fund contributions amounting to Rs. 10,29,26,330/- against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Schools' Petition Against EPF Damages Levy Under Special Scheme. Voluntary Coverage Under Employees' Enrollment Campaign, 2017, Assured No Penalty or Interest, and Respondent Estopped from Imposing Such Levies.

The petitioners, Jijamata Public School and Jijamata Krushi Tantra Vidyalaya, are public schools run by a public trust established in 2003, engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes EPF Orders Passed Without Proper Inquiry in Textile Processing Unit Case. Orders under Sections 7A and 7B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and lack of evidence.

The petitioner, M/s Dadu Processors (P) Ltd., a textile processing unit, challenged orders dated 29.12.2022 passed under Section 7A and 06.04.2023 pas...