Search Results for "Electricity Distribution Company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Electricity Distribution Company"

565 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 565 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petition Against CGRF Order in Electricity Connection Cost Refund Dispute. Distribution Licensee Not Obligated to Refund Infrastructure Costs for Dedicated Distribution Transformer Under Electricity Act, 2003.

22 Jan 2021

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), a Distribution Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003, filed thre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petition Against Electricity Ombudsman Order Limiting Recovery of Arrears Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. Court upholds two-year limitation period for recovery of electricity charges, rejecting claim for arrears from 2003 to 2010.

24 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated December 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SDO's Compensation Order in Transmission Line Dispute; Rules that Telegraph Authority Alone Has Jurisdiction Under Telegraph Act. Transmission Licensee Constituted as Telegraph Authority Under Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003 Holds Exclusive Power to Determine Compensation Under Section 10(d) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, and General Circulars Cannot Override.

7 Dec 2023

The writ petition was filed by Maharashtra Eastern Grid Power Transmission Company Ltd., a transmission licensee, challenging an order dated 05/09/201...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute. Demand Charges Must Be Based on Actual Utilisation, Not Contract Demand, Under Clause 14.11 of Tariff and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission Regulations, 2005.

27 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Over Collector’s Authority to Impose Conditions on Transmission Line Project Under Indian Telegraph Act

4 Aug 2017

The dispute arose from the construction of a 400 KV DC transmission line between Aurangabad and Boisar by Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., a Gove...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL Petition Challenging CGRF Order Setting Aside Interest and Delayed Payment Charges. Court holds that CGRF exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside demand without considering that respondent had not paid entire bill amount and that interest and DPC are governed by terms of supply and regulations.

12 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Licensee's Enhancement of Electricity Rates Under Electricity Supply Act, 1948 — Amendment Permits Unilateral Rate Adjustment to Maintain Reasonable Profit. Licensee's Power to Enhance Rates under Amended Schedule VI Upheld; No Vested Right of Consumers Protected by General Clauses Act, 1897.

26 Feb 1969

The dispute arose when Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd., a licensee under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, supplying electricity in Godhra area, unilatera...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Commission's Order Restricting Depreciation to Actual Supply Period in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Depreciation under Regulation 6.32 of DERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Generation Tariff) Regulations, 2011 cannot be allowed beyond the period of actual supply of electricity to consumers, as consumer interest is paramount under Section 61(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

7 May 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission) against the judgment of the Appellate Tribunal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Electricity Supply Dispute — Holds that Disputes Between Licensees Fall Within Exclusive Jurisdiction of State Electricity Regulatory Commission Under Section 86(1)(f) of Electricity Act, 2003. The court interpreted the word 'and' in Section 86(1)(f) disjunctively, covering disputes between licensees inter se, and rejected the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as the civil suit was barred.

28 Mar 2016

The plaintiff, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL), a distribution licensee, filed a civil suit for damages against defendant...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Agriculturist Due to Unexplained Delay in Granting Electricity Connection. The Court held that the respondent's delay of one decade after submission of test report constituted deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, warranting enhanced compensation of Rs 5,00,000.

8 Apr 2019

The appellant, Tukaram S/o Sadashiv Chaudhari, an agriculturist owning agricultural land in Maharashtra, applied for an electricity connection to his ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)