Search Results for "Duty Entitlement Pass Book"

208 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Terms.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles and spare parts, filed a writ petition befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Case Due to 24-Year Delay in Adjudication. Inordinate delay in adjudication of show cause notice under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 renders it stale and liable to be quashed as abuse of process.

The petitioners, Rachana Garments Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Kumar Bhartiya, challenged a show cause notice dated 27 June 1997 issued by the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Waiver of Pre-Deposit in Customs Dispute. BIFR Scheme Binding on Government Departments; Pre-Deposit Condition Quashed for Sick Industrial Company Under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director General o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Delivers Order on Writ Petitions Challenging DGFT Policy Circulars on SEIS Eligibility and Show Cause Notices. The Court Addresses the Ultra Vires Nature of Circulars No. 06/2018 and 08/2018 under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.

Two writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the validity of Policy Circulars No. 06/2018 dated 22.05.2018 and No. 08/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...