Search Results for "Deficient Stamp Duty"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Stamp Duty in Specific Performance Suit. Agreement for Sale Recognized Prior Possession, Thus Stamp Duty Payable Under Article 5(e)(ii) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, Not as Conveyance Under Article 5(e)(i).

The dispute originated from a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 23.06.2018 filed by respondent No.1 against the petitioner and other...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Unexecuted Lease Agreement — No Liability Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Adjudication under Section 31 cannot be basis for demand when document is not executed and no stamp duty is chargeable.

The petitioner, Crisil Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, had been in occupation of office premises at Hiranandani Business Park, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Stamp Duty on Octroi Collection Agreement as Lease. Agreement for collection of octroi by agent held to be a lease under Section 2(n)(iii) of Maharashtra Stamp Act and chargeable under Article 36(i) of Schedule I.

The petitioner, M/s. Sai Trading Company, a partnership firm, entered into an agreement on 27th April 2006 with the Sangli, Miraj and Kupwad City Muni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment Order for Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Property Valuation Dispute Remanded for Fresh Adjudication After Finding That Show-Cause Notice Was Not Served and Opportunity of Hearing Was Denied.

The petitioner, Armstrong Machine Builders Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order Due to Insufficiently Stamped MOU. Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Not Maintainable as Underlying Agreement Was Insufficiently Stamped Under Section 35 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The appeal arose from an order dated 30 August 2013 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Thane, allowing an application filed by the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record in Order Granting Time to Pay Deficit Stamp Duty. Review Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Ground Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC for Recall of Judgment.

The Review Petition No.340 of 2019 was filed by Seetharama Shetty (the petitioner/plaintiff) seeking recall of the judgment dated 23.08.2019 passed in...