Search Results for "Consolidation Proceedings"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Delay Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause. Amendment sought to incorporate subsequent events and additional reliefs held necessary for complete adjudication of dispute.

The present application was filed by the applicants/plaintiffs, Meteor Estates Pvt. Ltd. and Romesh Satyanarayan Sharma, seeking amendment of the plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Cancellation of Revenue Entry in Fragmentation Case — Sale Deed Not Void Ab Initio. Revenue Authorities Cannot Cancel Entries After 17 Years Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Under Gujarat Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The petitioners, Kantibhai Bhagwanbhai Narola and others, purchased agricultural land bearing Revenue Survey No. 651 admeasuring 1 Acre 6 Gunthas and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Determining Paternity and Ownership Rights in Consolidation Disputes under U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.

Relevant Provisions Discussed: U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953: Section 9: Filing of objections during consolidation proceedings. Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restores Injunction in Land Dispute — Consolidation Scheme Error and Possession Report Justify Interim Protection. Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside as It Ignored Material Evidence of Possession and Acquisition.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with their possession over land bearing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Co-owner Injunction Dispute Under Fragmentation Act. Court upholds concurrent findings that plaintiff proved possession and defendant failed to show ouster, affirming injunction against co-owner.

The appellant, Namdeo Bhau Chavan, was the original defendant in a suit for injunction filed by respondent No.1, Shantabai Kundlika Chavan, who was th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Impleadment of Co-owners in Suit for Possession. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Allows Addition of Parties with Direct Interest in Subject Matter to Avoid Multiplicity of Suits.

The petitioners, Sitaram Deorao Pawar and Totaram Deorao Pawar, filed two separate writ petitions challenging an order dated 6/11/2003 passed by the J...