Search Results for "Compulsory acquisition"

462 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 462 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition; Sets Aside Order of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Rejecting Condonation of Delay Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act. Compensation for Land Acquisition Exempt under RFCTLARR Act Not Considered by Revenue; Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision.

The petitioner, the widow of the deceased assessee, sought condonation of delay in filing the income tax return for the assessment year 2022-23. Her h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapse. Petitioners contend that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Sections 24, 25 of the 2013 Act due to non-making of award within prescribed period.

These writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings. The petitioners, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Legality of Land Acquisition for Jaipur Metro Rail Phase II, Focusing on Compliance with Section 5A Hearing. The Court Examined Whether Denial of Personal Hearing to Landowners Vitiates Acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals by landowners challenging a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that reversed a Single Judge's o...