Search Results for "Companies Amendment Act 2000"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Companies Amendment Act 2000"

782 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 782 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and RBI Circular on Stressed Assets Resolution. The Court held that the RBI circular dated 12.02.2018 is valid and not arbitrary, and that the requirement of 100% lender consent for restructuring and mandatory IBC reference for large accounts is within RBI's powers.

2 Apr 2019

The present batch of petitions and transferred cases challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1...

High Court

KAHC010259352010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

KAHC030038572012_1

22 Dec 2020

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Challenge to Royalty Rules Under MMDR Act. Petitioners Argue Notification and Amended Rule 64D Exceed Section 9(3) Powers.

8 May 2013

These writ petitions arose out of challenges by various mining leaseholders in Goa to the notification dated 13 August 2009, the amendment to Rule 64D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in MPID Act Case — Intercorporate Deposits Not Covered Under MPID Act. Loan advanced by one company to another company registered under Companies Act, 1956 does not constitute a 'deposit' under Section 2(c) of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Ashish Mahendrakar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Demerger and Restructuring of Nocil Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956. Court Approves Demerger of Petrochemicals and Polymer Division and Plastic Products Division into Two Separate Companies, Subject to Conditions Including Employee Protection and Compliance with Accounting Standards.

8 Jun 2005

The Bombay High Court considered three company petitions filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, by National Organic Chemical Indu...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

20 Aug 2015

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

High Court

KAHC010364002010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.

31 Mar 2006

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)